The world is changing you have to admit more companies want developer gender parity due to pressure from other non dev staff, government, management and shareholders. This is something developers will have to consider as to get gender parity new openings will surely have to all go to females.
Obviously am using a throw away here.
But I would like to rant this out.
Full disclosure. I am all for empowering women to fight against harassment. Give women a lot of tools to fight against people in power of the company. I am also all for higher maternity benefits. Its a shame that maternity benefits are not regulated in the country and there should be higher benefits. And I am against people viewing that being a women means that they have less tech skills than men. I am also all for MINIMUM % of females at the company.
The size of the company is around 100 people. Of which 40 are in tech. Of the 40, 12 are women. The rest of the 60 people departments are pretty much 30 men and 30 female.
Ever since, Canadian PM made sure that his cabinet will be 50% female and 50% male, in my experience there is a huge pressure for companies to close the gap that being employed between women and men.
During leadership meetings, women are constantly asking why they cannot find more female developers and constantly tell the leadership team to remove bias for women. At one point, one of them threaten to make it public that the company is not trying hard to be 50% women in tech. Cause if the PM can do it why can't the company do it? Already bootcamps and dev degrees in canada are 50/50 gender parity. https://devdegree.ca/ So there should not be any excuse for the company to not be completely 50/50 gender parity.
Then came the hiring for 5 more developers and even though we were open to all genders. I was a part of the hiring team and We disregarded several amazing male candidates. I was told privately that they have to do this because of constant pressure from the employees plus they need to look good in from of investors.
Finding good female candidates were extremely hard eventually we did find some but they were such in high demand its difficult to convince them to join our company because we are still pretty new. In the end what happened was that we had to offer them a higher salary. In the end we hired 5 employees where one was male and the other was females where some of the females have 15k higher salary then their male counter parts even though imo the male is stronger than them technically. i was part of the hiring team so i have the assessments.
The purpose for me writing this because i wanted people to be aware of it. IMO, this is not the right direction to solve gender discrimination. But companies are being forced to do this out of the fear of losing investors.
You may think its okay to hire people who are not the best but they are qualified females, please state your arguments so that I can discuss with you. To me this is forced and it may cause even more gender discrimination. For example this is happening to bumiputera in Malaysia where people from other races view them that they did not earn their success and take advantage of the system.
Regardless, I am all for minimum % but not completely close the gap. Minimum% because if a boss is clearly toxic against women then they could back each other to fight against the toxicity. 50/50 is ways too forced and imo will have a larger adverse effect than the marginal benefit it will provide.