911 Pentagon Video Released

Dominic Rooney said:
Since the fuel tanks are in the wings, when the plane it, the wings were liquified - hence no evidence of the wings.
Click to expand...
Why is everything else that would have been liquified by 10 tonnes of kerosene there? It seems that only the wings were conveniently liquified beyond a trace. Unless you admit that there aren't any other evidence of a plane. ;)
 
mooK said:
"shows the plane sliding along the ground"

so u reckon it was a missile sliding along the ground?
Click to expand...
No - I'm saying 'according to the debunkers' - the aeroplane is shown as sliding along the ground (they don't dispute this - according to them you can see this in the video.) I think that's just wishful breaking out of obscure detail in the background - possibly what you see is a dust, debris vortex created by an incoming missile. I'm trying to say those few stop frames is not the video I saw released on breaking news bbc - and I'm also saying that even if it is such as they present - then where is the debris field of an airliner sliding along the ground - the grass is pristine - but according to them and the video an x ton airliner just slid by.
 
kilo39 said:
I'm trying to say those few stop frames is not the video I saw released on breaking news bbc - and I'm also saying that even if it is such as they present - then where is the debris field of an airliner sliding along the ground - the grass is pristine - but according to them and the video an x ton airliner just slid by.
Click to expand...
I want that Pentalawn 2000. It's amazing how quickly it restores itself between the time of impact and the first photographs where it even cleaned up the debris of the aircraft they claimed where there.
 
the "Pentagon Lawn" claim

Several websites have claimed that photos show a debris free lawn in front of the Pentagon, and therefore this proves major anomalies in the attack. However, those sites generally show either photos taken long after the fire has been extinguished or photos that show signs of having been digitally altered.
Click to expand...

http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon-hole.html
 
Yeah, sure, the US staged the 9/11 conspiracy in front of the world news cameras but when it came down to planting some WMD's in the privacy of the Iraqi desert they were like, "Ya know what? Screw it!"

Come on. That's just not *gasp* logical.
 
Dominic Rooney the "Pentagon Lawn" claim
Several websites have claimed that photos show a debris free lawn in front of the Pentagon, and therefore this proves major anomalies in the attack. However, those sites generally show either photos taken long after the fire has been extinguished or photos that show signs of having been digitally altered.
Click to expand...
Look at my link given at the start of this thread: http://www.spaceimaging.com/gallery/9-11/default.htm 2 satellite photos taken 24 hours apart - where are the debris on the lawn? Your link http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1 shows them putting fires out/in the opening hours. Not a long cleanup or digitally altered (otherwise your own link is nonsense.) Your last link - love the way they put together pretty graphics - which then debunks the photo evidence (posted by you at the link abovetopsecret.) Both look like right-wing denial sites.
 
Okay so wtf, they PLANTED little pieces of plane at certain places and nobody noticed them PLANTING these little pieces of plane?
 
mooK said:
Okay so wtf, they PLANTED little pieces of plane at certain places and nobody noticed them PLANTING these little pieces of plane?
Click to expand...
No mooK - that is exactly the point (little pieces of plane) - something hit the building - but it wasn't a 757 (loaded with passengers - did they just vaporize too?)

/edit/ Yeah, sure, the US staged the 9/11 conspiracy in front of the world news cameras but when it came down to planting some WMD's in the privacy of the Iraqi desert they were like, "Ya know what? Screw it!"
2 different stories and issues.
 
Last edited:
2 different stories and issues.
Click to expand...

Er, yeah...

One Issue: Using 9/11 as an excuse, they invade Afghanistan, a country with no natural resources and important only for the dozens of Fundamentalist training camps. In your mind, they were willing to develop a conspiracy employing literally hundreds of people to attack themselves in broad daylight so they'd have an excuse to what, blow up terrorists?

Other Issue: Using WMD's as an excuse, they invade Iraq, a country that's strategically important to the region and sitting on a bog load of oil. And here, according to you, its perfectly logical that with all this to gain they weren't willing to develop a conspiracy involving one dude with a truck?

Pffft, yeah, whatever dude.
 
fewl said:
Yeah, sure, the US staged the 9/11 conspiracy in front of the world news cameras but when it came down to planting some WMD's in the privacy of the Iraqi desert they were like, "Ya know what? Screw it!"

Come on. That's just not *gasp* logical.
Click to expand...

Yah - exactly. Conspiracy theorists are typically facking crazy. Almost pointless debating such things because of the absurdity of the conspiracy, so in this case I only have this to add: Occam's razor.
 
Its all a mind game ... Well planned and thought of, we have no clue as to who is in control of the shots and I doubt we will ever know.

911 left lots of holes in its strategy so that you could neva pin point it and could be used for wateva
 
fewl said:
Er, yeah...

One Issue: Using 9/11 as an excuse, they invade Afghanistan, a country with no natural resources and important only for the dozens of Fundamentalist training camps. In your mind, they were willing to develop a conspiracy employing literally hundreds of people to attack themselves in broad daylight so they'd have an excuse to what, blow up terrorists?

Other Issue: Using WMD's as an excuse, they invade Iraq, a country that's strategically important to the region and sitting on a bog load of oil. And here, according to you, its perfectly logical that with all this to gain they weren't willing to develop a conspiracy involving one dude with a truck?

Pffft, yeah, whatever dude.
Click to expand...
LOL :D That's 2 much dude! No - they developed a plot - using fundamentalists in Afghanistan - to setup the american people for an program of expansionism - Afghanistan was just the by-product. And crushing those fundamentalists was a pre-emptive strike in the name of human freedom. Iraq? Good question - I often wondered the same. Any planted material is traceable? The Iraq paperwork, personal, the scrutiny of the IAEA didn't allow them to plant any material? They were convinced the material was really there - and it gave them the opportunity to complete unfinished business? - Their conviction and conviction against the other 'terrorist' states - justified their wish for expansionism - they needed a trigger - so they nurtured 911.
 
all we know is that someone nurtured 911 and sure as well wasn't Bin Laden, they found saddam in a hole how can't they find bin laden?
Click to expand...
The greatest propaganda tool created by America - Why would they want to find him? BL is alive and well and living in NY! Actually think he is long dead. There is no ways they cannot know where he is - if he is indeed anywhere - whichever way - they know!
 
freeek said:
all we know is that someone nurtured 911 and sure as well wasn't Bin Laden, they found saddam in a hole how can't they find bin laden?
Click to expand...
Because he's shaved. :D
 
Any comment on the latest BL tape? Me thinks biggest problem (for usa) is nobody believes them anymore.
 
america setup 911 why they did not plant evidence in iraq i do not know

maybe alot of america's army believe its fighting for the cause and it would not go down well if anyone knew they planted the evidence.

america want oil, they also want war to improve their failing economy

Iran is looking for a fight and they will get it from america this much i can assure you :)
 
america setup 911 why they did not plant evidence in iraq i do not know

maybe alot of america's army believe its fighting for the cause and it would not go down well if anyone knew they planted the evidence.
Click to expand...
Or maybe they genuinely thought - as did the intelligence agencies of every other Western power - that Iraq had WMD. Not finding WMDs is a big problem for you conspiracy wombats... they stage absolutely everything, and can't be bothered to plant a single dirty-bomb?

america want oil, they also want war to improve their failing economy
Click to expand...
pfffft... failing by what standard?

Iran is looking for a fight and they will get it from america this much i can assure you :)
Click to expand...
About time...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X