I look for the cheapest service for a reasonable amount of data(ie not cheap cause you get 1 GB data) and also on a entry level but you have to look at the broader picture for this solution, after all this is for
RURAL areas. From what I can tell this is the older sat solution of sending request via land network be it pots/ adsl/ wifi/ cellular technology unlike the 'newer' v-sat 2-way solutions.
The solution this company provides seem to be for real rural area's where there is still cellular coverage but nothing else. So basically the seem to have an agreement with mtn to handle requests thru their network via gprs or edge.
End-User-Info.pdf said:
The cost of a new ADSL installation roughly amounts to R2,258-24 for the first month.
Thereafter R867-44p/m for 1GB Data at 1,024kbps.
No mention that the cost of adsl router + installation cost(optional in some areas/self-install) which i am not sure comes to that price.. i know install was R404, router about R750?(the usb and other prices i could not find) to 1.3k(wifi+adsl) for a avg one thru telkom, external for R500. Monthly cost is NOT R867 per gig as it in someways misleads reading that line, but culmatively lower. more you buy less effective cost it becomes per gig. This solution simply cannot be compared to ADSL, cause it will work out more expensive.
Points of iffiness for me is that it is not very explicit as to upload/gprs cost which amounts to anything from about(bad rough estimate) 40? to 80MB+ per gig when downloading more in a non-p2p manner, ie just surfing + downloading usage. No mention of roaming costs.. cause vodacom has a better coverage of SA than mtn perhaps, so that may have to be factored in.
Question is.. 'Is the gprs coverage area large enough into rural area's to make this option really viable?'
Now.. The real comparison for a service like this would be where only gprs and perhaps egprs is available(cmp unbundled data rates and real possible gprs + egprs speeds) and would most likely be compared to v-sat. Using Telkom vsat product as a benchmark for expesiveness..(cause they always have a nice profit%

) it seems to be cost effective and from cheaper to more expensive due to upload channel.(Telkoms vsat works on a basic bundled allowance that increases wrt effective speed.. ALSO Telkom solution is contract based). Vsat max is also 512kbps where as this solution goes way beyond it, I wonder whats the contention for this service btw
So..
if you have no access to fixed line technology but can get a basic gprs signal it may work out ok for a othwise unattainable fast downlink but watch this space as WiMax comes..
** I have no idea of how effective coverage of other wifi, iburst, mywireless is but i think these are more in developed areas. shrug, if i am wrong correct me, i don't mind.. its all a learning experience
Busy looking thru Sentech.. looks expesive too(vsat) and again contract bound.
btw i'm trying to think of another company that offers a similar solution albeit via dial-up but i can't remember.. :/ best way to compare is with same access tech.