ADSL users, please post your speedtest.net results here.

[Fudzy]

Following fellow Cybersmart users complaints, I've also noticed a slow down for the last two weeks so I've decided to log my results from speedtest.net.

244kpbs / 99kbps on a 384kbps line

<img src="http://www.speedtest.net/result/299872521.png"></a>

 

[LancelotSA]

http://www.speedtest.net/result/299876578.png

340/103 on 384k line Johannesburg server


http://www.speedtest.net/result/299877437.png

376/93 on 384k line London server

 

[BigBear]

Here is ours:
512 Telkom Faster + Mweb 2GB + Dial-Up

09/07/2008 15:03

Download = 450 kb/s
Upload = 214 kb/s
ISP: Telkom SA
Server: Johannesburg
Ping:58ms
Distance:~50mi

This was before we Upgraded to AllInclusive Mweb 3GB 512.
Will post new stats 1 uncapped again.

 

[Noo]

My Stats

4096 kbps line - Web Africa is ISP

To Johannesburg Server
Download = 240 kpbs
Upload = 84 kbps
Ping = 117ms

To London Server
Download = 323 kpbs
Upload = 92 kbps
Ping = 896ms

Telkom and WA say there is nothing wrong with my line

 

[wcoetzee]

4096 kbps line - Web Africa is ISP

To Johannesburg Server
Download = 240 kpbs
Upload = 84 kbps
Ping = 117ms

To London Server
Download = 323 kpbs
Upload = 92 kbps
Ping = 896ms

Telkom and WA say there is nothing wrong with my line

some thing is a fault there

 

[wcoetzee]

329 kbps
100 kbps
JHB
btw what happened to the CT server

 

[bboy]

3435kbps
404kbps

4meg+ti 3 gig

 

[sludge]

320/104 kbps ---- joburg server. (ping = 51ms)

370/85 kbps ---- london server (ping = 795ms )

306/75 kbps ---- LA server (ping = 485ms)

384k line TI 3GB

 

[wcoetzee]

is'nt this just for cybersmart users on 384k ADSL
why is 4M and 512k TI users posting here

 

[bboy]

cause he asked "adsl users"

 

[zamrg]

4096 kbps line with TI 2gb

Johannesburg
http://www.speedtest.net/result/299942735.png
3488/333

London
http://www.speedtest.net/result/299944181.png
2392/372

 

[Flashgear]

4096kbps line with 5gb cap.

Joburg- 62 ping-3472/271
http://www.speedtest.net/result/300032373.png

 

[sand_man]

4096kbps line with telkom/cybersmart...

http://www.speedtest.net/result/300083076.png

 

[hotshothano]

im on 512/256 nd my results is..
download = 435
upload = 210
ping = 935
why my ping so high ????

 

[wcoetzee]

cause he asked "adsl users"

Read the OP very carefully
he would like to compare his 384k adsl from cybersmart to other 384k cybersmart users
you cant compare with 4m or 512k users from this or any other ISP
that just makes this thread null and void and collapse into a pissing contest

 

[sludge]

is'nt this just for cybersmart users on 384k ADSL
why is 4M and 512k TI users posting here

Read the OP very carefully
he would like to compare his 384k adsl from cybersmart to other 384k cybersmart users
you cant compare with 4m or 512k users from this or any other ISP
that just makes this thread null and void and collapse into a pissing contest

One word, and one word only, benchmark. Something to compare the cybersmart speeds to. It can only help

 

[sand_man]

Read the OP very carefully
he would like to compare his 384k adsl from cybersmart to other 384k cybersmart users

oops. sowi...

 

[BigBear]

Following fellow Cybersmart users complaints, I've also noticed a slow down for the last two weeks so I've decided to log my results from speedtest.net.

244kpbs / 99kbps on a 384kbps line

<img src="http://www.speedtest.net/result/299872521.png"></a>

Read carefully
Cybersmart users complained about speeds.
So it is to compare adsl speeds in general, but please remember to put your isp and stuff in detail.

 

[wcoetzee]

One word, and one word only, benchmark. Something to compare the cybersmart speeds to. It can only help

fair enough but then only 384k users should post with ISP name as the OP is a 384k user

 

[Mr_Kruger]

German "DSL light" (384kbps/64kbps)


http://www.speedtest.net/result/199104484.png