MagicDude4Eva
Banned
For transparency and as promised, I will post a follow-up on my ISPA complaint against Afrihost and have attached the full ruling of the adjudicator. I am impressed with ISPA's follow-through and professional detailed response.
The summary ruling is below (ruling upheld against one complaint, namely "Clause 8, in that it offers services beyond their technical and practical abilities;")
The full ruling is here: View attachment coc.875.adjudication.upheld.pdf
I hope this post does and ruling does not get censored, as it is a fair representation of valid consumer complaints. Also bear in mind that my complaint was lodged on 8th July 2015 for issues experience since August 2014 and as far as I can tell, still the majority of Afrihost users experience very similar issues.
Update: Many people asked about the complaints process - here some info
- Read and understand the Code of Conduct (CoC) - http://ispa.org.za/code-of-conduct/
- Understand the complaints process and turn-around-times - http://ispa.org.za/code-of-conduct/procedure/
- Lodge the complaint - http://ispa.org.za/code-of-conduct/complaints-form/
- You will notice that the complaints form does not allow you to attach documents. So when you get the COC confirmation and reference, reply to it and attach all supplemental information.
- In my case I had each COC violation backed up by facts (tickets, charts, outages and feedback)
- ISPA forwarded my complaint to AH and then forwarded me their response. In my case Afrihost responded to ISPA "We've made contact with the client and believe the complaint to be resolved. "
- The response was untrue, as I explained to Afrihost that a refund is one aspect but not the cornerstone of the complaint.
- I then asked ISPA to escalate to an independent adjudicator for review - this step is important if you believe that your issues are not resolved.
- Timelines:
-- 8th July: ISPA complaint lodged
-- 13th July: ISPA confirmed that they forwarded the complaint to AH
-- 23rd July: I sent follow-up mail to ISPA as AH should have responded within 5 business days
-- 24th July: ISPA confirmed that they sent a reminder to AH and that they will adjudicate if no response is received COB
-- 24th July: AH phones and said that they will refund 2 x R 997 for business uncapped - initially they wanted to give me credit, but I insisted on a refund on my card
-- 27th July: ISPA sends response from AH: "We've reached out to the client and believe the complaint to be resoled."
-- 27th July: I contested the response to ISPA with further detail
-- 28th July: ISPA forwards my email to AH
-- 3rd Aug: ISPA forwards response from AH "I believe we've been fair, open and transparent and have offered to resolve the complaint. As per the client's mail below, the client's expectation is that ISPA investigate further. We're eager and keen to resolve the complaint and would like to get ISPA's advice."
-- 4th Aug: Provided ISPA with additional information and escalation for independent review
-- 6th Aug: Received feedback from ISPA that adjudicator will be appointed
-- 14th Oct: Received ruling
The summary ruling is below (ruling upheld against one complaint, namely "Clause 8, in that it offers services beyond their technical and practical abilities;")
Sanctions
Having found a breach of Clause 8, I must consider an appropriate sanction. It is obvious to me that the ISP cannot be asked to stop marketing its services at all. However, it is within my powers to order appropriate remedial action, and in this regard I order that the ISP make it patently clear on initial perusal of its websites that it is experiencing technical difficulties and that service it may not meet the offered service levels at this time. This information should be communicated upfront on the website, and pro-actively to each existing and potential customer until such time as these issues are resolved.
To ensure compliance, I am also imposing a suspended sanction of R50 000 that will be enforced should the ISP be found in breach of this clause again in the next 24 months.
The full ruling is here: View attachment coc.875.adjudication.upheld.pdf
I hope this post does and ruling does not get censored, as it is a fair representation of valid consumer complaints. Also bear in mind that my complaint was lodged on 8th July 2015 for issues experience since August 2014 and as far as I can tell, still the majority of Afrihost users experience very similar issues.
Update: Many people asked about the complaints process - here some info
- Read and understand the Code of Conduct (CoC) - http://ispa.org.za/code-of-conduct/
- Understand the complaints process and turn-around-times - http://ispa.org.za/code-of-conduct/procedure/
- Lodge the complaint - http://ispa.org.za/code-of-conduct/complaints-form/
- You will notice that the complaints form does not allow you to attach documents. So when you get the COC confirmation and reference, reply to it and attach all supplemental information.
- In my case I had each COC violation backed up by facts (tickets, charts, outages and feedback)
- ISPA forwarded my complaint to AH and then forwarded me their response. In my case Afrihost responded to ISPA "We've made contact with the client and believe the complaint to be resolved. "
- The response was untrue, as I explained to Afrihost that a refund is one aspect but not the cornerstone of the complaint.
- I then asked ISPA to escalate to an independent adjudicator for review - this step is important if you believe that your issues are not resolved.
- Timelines:
-- 8th July: ISPA complaint lodged
-- 13th July: ISPA confirmed that they forwarded the complaint to AH
-- 23rd July: I sent follow-up mail to ISPA as AH should have responded within 5 business days
-- 24th July: ISPA confirmed that they sent a reminder to AH and that they will adjudicate if no response is received COB
-- 24th July: AH phones and said that they will refund 2 x R 997 for business uncapped - initially they wanted to give me credit, but I insisted on a refund on my card
-- 27th July: ISPA sends response from AH: "We've reached out to the client and believe the complaint to be resoled."
-- 27th July: I contested the response to ISPA with further detail
-- 28th July: ISPA forwards my email to AH
-- 3rd Aug: ISPA forwards response from AH "I believe we've been fair, open and transparent and have offered to resolve the complaint. As per the client's mail below, the client's expectation is that ISPA investigate further. We're eager and keen to resolve the complaint and would like to get ISPA's advice."
-- 4th Aug: Provided ISPA with additional information and escalation for independent review
-- 6th Aug: Received feedback from ISPA that adjudicator will be appointed
-- 14th Oct: Received ruling
Last edited: