You can always schedule the larger downloads for after hours too![]()
And for when shall we schedule downloads when after hours is shaped as well?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
You can always schedule the larger downloads for after hours too![]()
I don't plan my downloads as I don't download a lot, sometimes I need something NOW. I am normally not a heavy user averaging 20Gb a month on a 10Mbps account, so being shaped to 12.5% is a bit harsh
It is harsh, we know it's a far from ideal solution![]()
I'm sure that our team will have something implemented to have the shaping eased for more users.
I don't plan my downloads as I don't download a lot, sometimes I need something NOW. I am normally not a heavy user averaging 20Gb a month on a 10Mbps account, so being shaped to 12.5% is a bit harsh
And for when shall we schedule downloads when after hours is shaped as well?
Too little to late, I am gone.
Why not opt for a capped account in that case
I could have done that it would have saved me a lot, I didn't mind subsidising for other users for a while, maybe one day my internet habits will change and I would use my fair share. The uncapped model only will work if you have low end users, mixed with high end users, but what pisses me of being such a low end user being shaped so badly when I need something NOW, specially when I was reading some other post from about the same time where they say their downloads where flying. Something just does not add up.
But now I most probably I will go for a capped account, but not with afrihost as they will have lost my business for a while
must agree with moklet - the all or nothing approach hurts the low end users - anyone under, say 80gigs, should not be shaped at all.
As I mentioned before, with the current constraints AH should rather shape according to individual use instead of network load. Lower end users are losing out.
We still really do believe that shaping based on overall network load allows us better management of our network. Shaping clients based on their individual usage seems a bit backwards to us - and will also complicate realtime processes.
It seems a bit backward for my bank account to keep on subsidising for a severely shaped experience, you guys rather have your low end user leave you so that there is more space for the high end users. Well you got what you want. Just remember for uncapped to work you will need a mix of low end users to subsidise high end users. If there is nothing in it for me as a low end user, e.g I get punished the same as the top downloader then yes it is time to move on
Fully agree with that. I would think that if capped & business uncapped users were shaped to just a small amount (90%?) to ease the shaping for home uncapped accounts (12.5% after hours is just ridiculous) it makes a lot more sense. Or maybe at this point it would be better to introduce the prioritization approach that OW has (bronze/silver/gold accounts)
Just my uninformed opinion though, I don't know anything about the internal processes of an ISP. But as it stands there is no reason for home uncapped users to stay with AH.
We truly believe that there is a deeper underlaying issue that's causing this. Our Business and Capped accounts have been setup specifically not to see any shaping - I'm afraid we can't change that now![]()
We truly believe that there is a deeper underlaying issue that's causing this. Our Business and Capped accounts have been setup specifically not to see any shaping - I'm afraid we can't change that now![]()
I still believe P2P and NNTP should be shaped and even blocked on business accounts. If said businesses want to priorities such protocols then they should incur the additional expense of routing said traffic through VPN's.
Otherwise, business accounts should be for businesses only and proof of such business needs to be established before account approval is initiated. Far too many people are using Afrihost's cheap business accounts as a means to abuse the network further.
Don't shoot the messenger :erm:
I still believe P2P and NNTP should be shaped and even blocked on business accounts. If said businesses want to priorities such protocols then they should incur the additional expense of routing said traffic through VPN's.
Otherwise, business accounts should be for businesses only and proof of such business needs to be established before account approval is initiated. Far too many people are using Afrihost's cheap business accounts as a means to abuse the network further.
Nobody's shooting the messenger; the messenger needs to convey to everyone else at Afrihost what the current public perception of their offerings is.