Here's an interesting (and for once, hopefully non-political) issue:
Via IOL
My question is: how are airlines actually hurt by no-shows? I'm pretty sure they don't refund their ticket price, so if the ticket is paid for, what does it matter if someone's actually sitting in the seat or not?
And if they do refund the ticket, wouldn't it be better to stop doing that, rather than allow deliberate overbooking?
The airlines attempt to predict how many people won't turn up for the flight, and then overbook, in the hope that the extra bookings will compensate for the "no shows".
But, as many South Africans have discovered, airlines often get their sums horribly wrong, and people who have booked and paid are "bumped off" the flight.
"If I made out a cheque in payment for a flight, and when the airline tried to cash it, they were told there were no funds, they'd consider that to be fraud," Knight said.
Yet the airlines call their practice of routinely denying ticket-holding passengers a seat on a plane "international procedure", he said.
Knight played a key role in drawing up the latest draft of the Consumer Protection Bill, which is due to go to Parliament later this month.
It has thrown the cat among the pigeons by requiring airlines not only to refund the airfare to those bumped off flights - with interest - but also to fund any "consequential damages for any economic harm" suffered by the stranded person as a result.
Via IOL
My question is: how are airlines actually hurt by no-shows? I'm pretty sure they don't refund their ticket price, so if the ticket is paid for, what does it matter if someone's actually sitting in the seat or not?
And if they do refund the ticket, wouldn't it be better to stop doing that, rather than allow deliberate overbooking?