'Alien life' may be found on Earth

[Apache]

We dont have to as I already proven that it did, well at least twice, we have arsenic based life forms as well as life forms living off sulpher, what more do you need.

Which one are you?

 

[porchrat]

The guy in the article is basically saying that if life started the way you say. Then why did it not start multiple times?

and I'm saying what evidence suggests that it had to?

And from a creationists viewpoint, if it did not start multiple times then perhaps the ideas commonly held by the scientific community is incorrect. And so we need to look at creation as an alternative.

There is no logic in this statement. There is no reason to assume that life would need to have started multiple times.

I'm not saying life didn't start multiple times. I'm saying whether it did or not really has no bearing on the validity of abiogenesis as a field. It isn't like the entirety of abiogenesis hangs on the assumption that life only arose once.

EDIT: seriously am I missing something here because I really don't get it.



As to creation as an alternative. Alternative to what? Science? You can't prove or disprove anything about creationism. It isn't science. It isn't logical and it doesn't belong in a classroom. It isn't an alternative theory to evolution because it isn't a theory, it isn't even a hypothesis.

 

[Ronjay]

I could answer that easily for you.

But I'll let Apache speak for themselves.

Split personality disorder?

 

[copacetic]

Split personality disorder?

Wasn't wanting to imply sex.

 

[Ronjay]

Wasn't wanting to imply sex.

Ah, I see. Might have been better to say 'itself'. Still, from Apache's posts in this thread, there is some sort of disorder for sure.