All Time Premiership Log

@ Poolmania

Barcelona has more silverware than Liverpool. They are a more succesful club than your precious Liverpool. Why only compare those two competitions?

The most evident one being Barcelona finishing second in the league 22 times compared to Liverpool 11 times. LoL

Must be sad for Pool supporters to watch their team fail every single year in the local league.

Smokey is correct - Chelsea were not a poor team before Roman.

This is probably due to the English League being more competitive than the Spanish League.

Let's look at some stats:

Spanish sides that have won the European Cup - 2, Real Madrid (9) and Barcelona (2).

English sides that have won the European Cup - 4, Liverpool (5), Manchester United (3), Nottingham Forest (2) and Aston Villa (1).

Spanish sides that have won the Spanish Top Division - 9

English sides that have won the English Top Division - 23

Compelling evidence, no?
 
Take off your Liverpool goggles. You clearly dont understand how the points system works.

So if Orlando Pirates were to win a 100 domestic cups - would they be the most successful?

You make me laugh! You got owned thinking that Liverpool has more trophies than Barca. LoL - weak attempt at a comeback reply.

:eek:OMG you have not given any facts ,you were the one that claimed barca are more successfull than liverpool because they won more trophies :rolleyes:

i proved to you that its not about how many tropies you win its about how many major tophies you win which determine who's more succesfull ...i give up with you

if fifa would follow your analogy of whoever has the most tropies is the most succesfull the old firm would be no 1 and 2 :rolleyes:as they clearly have more trophies :p
 
@ poolmania - i disagree. The Spanish league is by far more competitve than the EPL due to there being more depth in the league.

I dont have time to post an article i posted on another forum a few months ago where a table clearly shows the last 10 years and the points difference between the two leagues of all the teams.

In the table it is clear to see that the top 4 in England are head and shoulders above the rest of the league. In Spain, it is more balanced out with more clubs competing for the title. If you dont know this by now and you are a football supporter, then sadly this debating with you is useless.

@ guru - International trophies you want?

International competitions

UEFA Champions League
Winners (2): 1992, 2006

UEFA Cup Winners' Cup (record)
Winners (4): 1979, 1982, 1989, 1997

European Super Cup
Winners (2): 1992, 1997


International Trophies

Inter-Cities Fairs Cup (UEFA Cup's predecessor) (record)
Winners (3): 1958, 1960, 1966

Inter-Cities Fairs Cup Trophy Play-Off
Winners (1): 1971

Latin Cup (record)
Winners (2): 1949, 1952

Small World Cup
Winners (1): 1957


Liverpool
International
European Cup and UEFA Champions League
Winners (5): 1977, 1978, 1981, 1984, 2005

UEFA Cup
Winners (3): 1973, 1976, 2001

UEFA Super Cup
Winners (3): 1977, 2001, 2005

Last seasons UEFA rankings.
1 Manchester United Eng CL 13 29 34.8985
2 Chelsea Eng CL 13 25 30.8985
3 FC Barcelona Esp CL 12 25 29.5785
4 Liverpool Eng CL 12 21 26.8985

Why is Barcelona ranked higher than Liverpool if they only won 2 major trophies in your eyes?
 
Last edited:
:eek:OMG are you for real ,dude that means that because you won more minor (doesnt mean anything tophies) that you are more succesfull...lol

so if you using this analogy then Celtic fc is more successfull than real madrid ,ac milan, liverpool ,manure ,barcelona cause they have more trophies than all those team :rolleyes:

let me give you the stats then

celtic fc 42 league champs ,1 CL total 43 major trophies
real madrid 31 league champs ,9 CL total 40 major trophies
Ac milan 17 league champs , 7 CL total 24 major trophies
Liverpool fc 18 league champs ,5 CL total 23 major trophies
Barcelona 18 league champs , 2 CL total 20 major trophies
Manure 17 league champs ,3 CL total 20 major trophies


Can someone please phone FIFA as they gave club of the century to the wrong club ,it should have gone to Celtic seeing as they won the most major trophies put together :rolleyes:

dude take off your Barca hat :D

If you didnt start watching football this season you would know that the Scottish league is rated below other european leagues, hence if 1 team won it 1000 times it would mean nothing in the ratings system.
 
@ poolmania - i disagree. The Spanish league is by far more competitve than the EPL due to there being more depth in the league.

In the table it is clear to see that the top 4 in England are head and shoulders above the rest of the league. In Spain, it is more balanced out with more clubs competing for the title. If you dont know this by now and you are a football supporter, then sadly this debating with you is useless.

I'm sorry Genius, but why do you keep missing or avoiding the point. I was not talking about currently. I was talking about since 1890 as it was in response to your lolz about Barcelona being 22 times runners up compared to Liverpool's 11 times.

The stats I posted have no say according to you in deciding this matter.
 
If you didnt start watching football this season you would know that the Scottish league is rated below other european leagues, hence if 1 team won it 1000 times it would mean nothing in the ratings system.

Exactly why i said he doesnt know how the points system works.

Still laughing at his attempt to argue a very weak point tho.

guru_pitka trying to debate is like Liverpool trying to win the league. Always thinking they can but in reality they were never even close.
 
Poolmania, you dont have to be a rocket scientist to see Liverpool are just not good enough as a team. That is why they cant win the league and almost never compete for it.

Your stats mean what exactly? From 1890? What year are we in? Should i also post facts from what our respective clubs were doing more than a century ago.

Question?

Why is it that Liverpool cannot even compete for the league?
 
Last seasons UEFA rankings.


Why is Barcelona ranked higher than Liverpool if they only won 2 major trophies in your eyes?

Genius, I have to ask:

What have those rankings got to do with the History of European football which is what we're talking about? Seriously, you can't tell me that the rankings above is your evidence, serious? Those are last years rankings and have nothing to do with the history of Barcelona and Liverpool in terms of trophies. If you want to bring in that sort of evidence, then I might as well bring in this years Uefa Rankings which have Liverpool as No.1.

Come on Genius, a bit of common sense for once.
 
Last seasons UEFA rankings.


Why is Barcelona ranked higher than Liverpool if they only won 2 major trophies in your eyes?

I can also do this :D

this years uefa rankings
1 Liverpool Eng 28.1140 15.8855 27.3250 24.5750 21.5110 117.410
2 FC Barcelona Esp 15.4875 32.1285 17.8000 27.7750 19.4125 112.603
3 Chelsea Eng 23.1140 15.8855 26.3250 28.5750 18.5110 112.410
4 AC Milan Ita 29.8000 24.0710 26.3855 16.0500 14.2500 110.556
5 Manchester United Eng 15.1140 10.8855 25.3250 32.5750 18.5110 102.410

why is Liverpool ranked no 1 if Barca have more trophies :rolleyes:
 
Simple. Those rankings had Barca at number one.

One would think how can Barca be ranked higher than Liverpool if i were to use guru's thinking?

In his eyes Liverpool are FAR ahead of Barcelona cos they have 18 league titles and 5 CL trophies.

How then can a team like Barca with not as much, how did guru say? MAJOR TROPHIES, be ahead of the strong and powerful Liverpool.
 
The most evident one being Barcelona finishing second in the league 22 times compared to Liverpool 11 times. LoL

This is probably due to the English League being more competitive than the Spanish League.

Let's look at some stats:

Spanish sides that have won the European Cup - 2, Real Madrid (9) and Barcelona (2).

English sides that have won the European Cup - 4, Liverpool (5), Manchester United (3), Nottingham Forest (2) and Aston Villa (1).

Spanish sides that have won the Spanish Top Division - 9

English sides that have won the English Top Division - 23

Compelling evidence, no?

I'm sorry Genius, but why do you keep missing or avoiding the point. I was not talking about currently. I was talking about since 1890 as it was in response to your lolz about Barcelona being 22 times runners up compared to Liverpool's 11 times.

Do I have to repeat everything I said? I'm still waiting for your response with regards to the above.

Poolmania, you dont have to be a rocket scientist to see Liverpool are just not good enough as a team. That is why they cant win the league and almost never compete for it.

Your stats mean what exactly? From 1890? What year are we in?

Sigh, can anyone else help him out here because I've tried.

Should i also post facts from what our respective clubs were doing more than a century ago.

Question?

Why is it that Liverpool cannot even compete for the league?

Again, what has Liverpool's current form got to do with anything I have said.
 
I can also do this :D

this years uefa rankings


why is Liverpool ranked no 1 if Barca have more trophies :rolleyes:

Those rankings are in european competition (nothing to do with a team being any good domesticaly) and have more to do with the epl having a top finsih in the rankings last season as that counts for 33% of their points and liverpool winning the competition a few years back.

Liverpool still have less tropheys and even less of a chance of actually winning a league trophey.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X