AMD Trinity A-Series APU review
AMD has launched their latest CPU/GPU combo chipset. We put it through it’s paces
AMD has launched their latest CPU/GPU combo chipset. We put it through it’s paces
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Comparing a chip that costs around R1500 and is a dual-module quad-core CPU with onboard graphics to a R3000-odd six-core processor based on AMD's K10 architecture seems a little idiotic, don't you think? The A10 should have received a higher gaming and graphics score because its miles away from what Intel can muster with its integrated graphics compared to VLIW4 in Trinity, which is built for gaming at 720p with medium details.
There's no gaming benchies, no power consumption results and nothing in the line of overclocking to see how much it would take for Trinity with discrete graphics to match the performance of the K10 architecture. I know MyBB doesn't have much space for reviews due to their in-house rules but come on - this could have been done much better.
I found this review pretty odd, seeing that most other places did their review like almost 2 months ago!
Many places didn't really benchmark the graphics at all, which let me believe that those sites favour Intel.
When you install a dedicated graphics card, then the Intel Ivy Bridge i3 outperforms this AMD CPU![]()
Quintin van Rooyen is a lifelong technophile and IT tinkerer.
True.
5 For graphics?
Well i am not a tinkerer but this guy doesn't know what hes talking about. Compared to what is this a 5 score? It should be 10 cause there's nothing else with integrated graphics on chip that comes close.
Why would anyone use something like this with a dedicated graphics card? It defeats the purpose.
Do you know if installing a dedicated graphics card will turn it into a crossfire setup? (graphics card + onchip graphics)
Another feature that the A85X adds to the table is the ability to run two discrete GPUs in a CrossFire configuration. You can run a single discrete card at x16 or two at x8. Of course, the socket FM2 APUs already come with a decent GPU on-die. If you need something more powerful, it would probably be easier to buy a discrete Radeon HD 6000 or 7000 series GPU and pair in CrossFireX with the on-die GPU.
Do you know if installing a dedicated graphics card will turn it into a crossfire setup? (graphics card + onchip graphics)
Comparing a chip that costs around R1500 and is a dual-module quad-core CPU with onboard graphics to a R3000-odd six-core processor based on AMD's K10 architecture seems a little idiotic, don't you think? The A10 should have received a higher gaming and graphics score because its miles away from what Intel can muster with its integrated graphics compared to VLIW4 in Trinity, which is built for gaming at 720p with medium details.
There's no gaming benchies, no power consumption results and nothing in the line of overclocking to see how much it would take for Trinity with discrete graphics to match the performance of the K10 architecture. I know MyBB doesn't have much space for reviews due to their in-house rules but come on - this could have been done much better.
True.
5 For graphics?
Well i am not a tinkerer but this guy doesn't know what hes talking about. Compared to what is this a 5 score? It should be 10 cause there's nothing else with integrated graphics on chip that comes close.
Why would anyone use something like this with a dedicated graphics card? It defeats the purpose.
I found this review pretty odd, seeing that most other places did their review like almost 2 months ago!
Many places didn't really benchmark the graphics at all, which let me believe that those sites favour Intel.
When you install a dedicated graphics card, then the Intel Ivy Bridge i3 outperforms this AMD CPU![]()