American doing what they do best:

w1z4rd said:
Tell you what Softturd. Provide the complete list of the current 50 countries 'occupied' by America
Click to expand...
Tell you what, PukeW1z4rd, how 'bout you stop calling me names? You might get a more civilized response from me.
 
StrongTurd said:
Tell you what, PukeW1z4rd, how 'bout you stop calling me names? You might get a more civilized response from me.
Click to expand...

I actually wrote that out wrong when I typed it. I was not trying to intentionally call you names. Sorry.

Edit: fixed my typo
 
w1z4rd said:
I actually wrote that out wrong when I typed it. I was not trying to intentionally call you names. Sorry.

Edit: fixed my typo
Click to expand...
That's better, apology accepted. I'll get back to you on that list a little later; I'm just a little busy right now.
 
StrongTurd said:
That's better, apology accepted. I'll get back to you on that list a little later; I'm just a little busy right now.
Click to expand...

Cool beans, and I will subscribe to this thread so I can be sure to follow your reply :)
 
cyberarmy said:
Propaganda.....Everyone believes what the Americans said.........
Click to expand...

Bwahahahaha so who do you believe. Extremists blowing up innocent men, woman and children in markets with chemical truck bombs. Eish :o


Amerikanse said:
What's more, you won't find this story on BBC, CNN,
Click to expand...

As we now know BBC admits they suppress news they deem positive and CNN pretty much admitted to suppressing the success of the surge as well. Their head of news made totally ridiculous claims that U.S were troops committing premeditated murder against journalists. Of course when he held to account he couldn’t back up his claims and had to resign.

fay said:
Uninvited bas***s. they deserve no sympathy. they must go back, perhaps in box.
those idiots who sport them must goin them.
Click to expand...

Notice nothing about Al Qaeda being uninvited. :o
 
alanf85 said:
yeah sure :rolleyes:

Americans haven't killed a minute fraction of that number. Al aqeada, Baathists and Shia militia are responsible for the overwhelming majority.

Of course the million odd killed from sanctions during Saddam’s reign was far better:o
Click to expand...

Would that many be dead if the yanks were not there is the question you need to ask and answer for yourself.
It is ok though, the arms business is booming, the oil is flowing in between the chaos that remains as a result of the US occupation.
They are alright though, driving down to the cafe in their 4L vehicles, snubbing Kyoto and climate change.
Americans look out for themselves and the rest of the world can go to hell. Hardly something to admire.
 
Sneeky said:
Would that many be dead if the yanks were not there is the question you need to ask and answer for yourself.
Click to expand...

In any war causualties go up. If the U.S had not defended S.K less people would have died. If they hadn't declared war on Japan less people would died. :rolleyes:

Estimates vary between 1 million and 1.5 million from sanctions alone over 13 years. Now you do the math on how many probably would have died over the last 4 and a half years. At least now they have a chance rather than be systemically killed off out of sight and out of mind like some here would prefer:sick:

It is ok though, the arms business is booming, the oil is flowing in between the chaos that remains as a result of the US occupation.
They are alright though, driving down to the cafe in their 4L vehicles, snubbing Kyoto and climate change.
Americans look out for themselves and the rest of the world can go to hell. Hardly something to admire
Click to expand...
.

Oil is not flowing. Under Saddam oil was flowing not now when the country still has so many problems
 
alanf85 said:
In any war causualties go up.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, I thought the war was over in 2003 when that baboon of a president said so and under Saddam oil was flowing, just not at what the yanks deemed was a good price.
The first gulf war was a result Kuwait flooding the market with cheap oil, to the detriment of the surrounding states. Saddam got pissed and invaded then got his arse kicked by the yanks protecting the cheap oil.
The balance of power in the middle east is critical to the US economy, so they will trample over anyone and do anything to secure the resources, under the banner of freedom and liberation.
Come liberate Zim, then I will change my mind.
 
Last edited:
Sneeky said:
Come liberate Zim, then I will change my mind.
Click to expand...

But what about Burma then? Half of Africa must be invaded. Why do you put Zim above the rest :eek:

And where exactly do you think they're gonna get the resources and manpower :o
 
alanf85 said:
But what about Burma then? Half of Africa must be invaded. Why do you put Zim above the rest :eek:

And where exactly do you think they're gonna get the resources and manpower :o
Click to expand...

Alan, the basis is that they 'intervene' only where their own interests are served first and fore mostly. It is never about freedom and liberation. It is always about the US.
 
Sneeky said:
Alan, the basis is that they 'intervene' only where their own interests are served first and fore mostly. It is never about freedom and liberation. It is always about the US.
Click to expand...

Actually those two aren't mutually exclusive. It's in the U.S best interests to have democracy in other countries.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X