marine1
Honorary Master
Funny that they have not destroyed the dome of the rock mosque
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Funny that they have not destroyed the dome of the rock mosque
I reflect the attitude of the person I'm addressing.marine1 said:Arguing with you is like talking to a child. Go and look at the history books. If you cannot see the truth then I feel for you.
Why do people generally hold on to territory they gain through conquest?Alanf85 said:I asked why? What's the reason for holding onto it?
Well you're free to show the article is untrue.Bwahahahahah
Counterpunch.
Why does Bush mouth off about things like an "axis of evil"? Or HW Bush talking about creating a "new world order" and being a "shining beacon on the hill" for civilisation?The extremist element want the destruction of Israel. It's unreasonable to want to erase a country from existence. They say it but you just write it off as rhetoric . Why do they partake in this rhetoric then?
If that's what you think then I pity you.You the one siding with Islamic fundamentalists. What is even more ironic is you are an "infidel".
The US is a police state and is the main cause of much of the fighting currently going on in the world. So yeah, Iran is also not a nice place to live, but at least I would never have to have the money I earn end up as supporting one of the most morally bankrupt forces on the planet.Anyone who would rather live in Iran than America is a fanatic IMO.
At least I can own up to making a mistake.Anyway you calling me a fanatic is reassuring. Being seen is as reasonable by a moonbat is rather disturbing.
You lump all muslims with any aspirations of self-determination into the fundamentalist camp. That's close enough to all muslims for anyone who cares to look at the situation (and the west's role in it) critically.Getting desperate are we. Resorting to fearmongering. I never said all muslims did I?
Maybe you should do more research. Really, the idea that Iraq had enough weapons lying around to supply insurgents with everything they needed for a whole three years is rather hard to believe.Maybe you should do more research on Saddam ruled Iraq then.
Yeah I'm sure they like to be oppressed.
I was asking a question. No inferences can be drawn from it.You yourself said "who on earth thinks Iran is democratic"
No, he was a CIA installed dictator.Was Saddam democratic?
So you'd be happier if the women were given lethal injections?Who says they like it. Why so many dissidents then. What about stoning woman to death. Is that acceptable because most Iranians are muslim and supposidly want to be run by extremists.
Et tu, Brute?True.
But someone needs to challenge his views. As you can see it's not hard at all. If anything it's so other people can see both sides and it can help them make their own minds up.
And how would a wholly made IED be tracable back to Iran if the parts were not?Syndyre said:Not necessarily, Iran may be supplying components for the construction of IED's so the actual devices can't be directly linked back to them.
I know he had weapon caches lying around - but I find the idea that there were enough to support guerilla warfare for three years to be improbable.Syndyre said:I suspect he probably did have a huge cache of weapons but weapons are easily available on the black market anyway.
I didn't manage to find a list of nations that use Sharia. But I do know it's not universally hated and in some cases in Africa the populace demanded the option to be tried in sharia courts. There are countries where the courts run concurrently to other, more western, courts.It's not proof but taken in conjunction with all the other evidence it does start to build a fairly convincing case for the lack of democracy. Is there any democratic country where Sharia is in place? Maybe there's a reason it tends to be so unpopular when people are given a choice.
regarded by us as the arbiter - I'm not sure Hezbollah feels the same way.I read the entire link, I'm just saying that the UN which is generally regarded as the arbiter in these disputes concluded that the territory was Syrian, and the UN does not regard the whole of Lebanon to be Syrian territory.
Interesting that you should be against that ideaWhy do people generally hold on to territory they gain through conquest?![]()
Well, there was no international law against such things back then. I think we can both agree that wars of conquest are to be avoided, yes?Interesting that you should be against that idea . If you look carefully in your history book, you will see who invaded whom and when. How do the Palestinians make a claim to Jerusalem in the first place?
Why do people generally hold on to territory they gain through conquest?
In this case the zionists believe a bunch of bilge that the whole area (which, iirc includes parts of lebanon, syria, jordan) belonging to greater Israel. There's more than one kind of fanatic in the middle east.
Why does Bush mouth off about things like an "axis of evil"? Or HW Bush talking about creating a "new world order" and being a "shining beacon on the hill" for civilisation?
If that's what you think then I pity you.
The US is a police state and is the main cause of much of the fighting currently going on in the world. So yeah, Iran is also not a nice place to live, but at least I would never have to have the money I earn end up as supporting one of the most morally bankrupt forces on the planet.
At least I can own up to making a mistake.
You lump all muslims with any aspirations of self-determination into the fundamentalist camp. That's close enough to all muslims for anyone who cares to look at the situation (and the west's role in it) critically.
Maybe you should do more research. Really, the idea that Iraq had enough weapons lying around to supply insurgents with everything they needed for a whole three years is rather hard to believe.
I was asking a question. No inferences can be drawn from it.
No, he was a CIA installed dictator.
So you'd be happier if the women were given lethal injections?
Et tu, Brute?
Rofl.
Alanf85 said:So why haven't they held onto other territory they gained through "conquest".
Just look who they vote for. Right now it IS the majority. That's why there's settlers all over the occupied territories - because they believe they have a religious mandate to occupy and rule the land.Really. Are these the views of the majority of Israelis
Bad example. I think he really does believe it. But then he also believes that God talks to him directly and that he's on a divine mission.Ah. You telling me that's just rhetoric and he doesn't actually believe it himself.
No one's.So who's side you on then
Patriot act, TIPS, Warrantless Wiretapping, Guantanamo Bay, Military Commissions Act of 2006...The U.S a police state
Just like in America you get arrested if you don't protest in specially designated areas kilometers from the actual thing being protested and out of sight or earshot from anyone else.Woman hold a peacefull demonstration for their rights and State Security Forces clamp it down and arrest them.
Yeah, so because America isn't a nice place to live, Iran must be heaven on earth? Please.Where's the morals in Iran if America is bankrupt then.
And how many of those are Pro-US despite the fact that the majority of the population aren't, and the fact that the rulers have to maintain an iron grip in order to maintain power? Is that what you call self-determination? Guess the yanks had nothing to moan about in the 1770s.Really. Where are the democracies in the muslim world? Have I said anything about Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt, Dubai, Indonesia, Qatar...... being a threat to anyone?
Beacuse then they could have been used in the first days of the War by Saddam. Afterall, if there were these massive stores of weapons, why didn't he use them?Why not?
No, not all.Aren't they all
So then say so and stop whining about the way that it's done. "Putting women to death for illegitimate reasons" is not the same as "stoning women to death."No. Killing a woman because she had an affair or killed a rapist trying to abuse her is wrong.
Then I suggest you stop reading into what I say.You on the other hand give the impression it is acceptable.
I'd rather get a little muddled some of the time rather than being ignorant most of the time.Why then do you get so muddled?
Yeah, says the person who refuses to source their claims about Hezbollah ditching uniforms.Skeptik said:Xarog is dodging questions again. I'm abandoning arguing with simpletons.