Neither were good men in my book, one was a terrorist and the other quite a 'right' orientated individual in the np that seized an opportunity to advance himself and make himself look like the good guy.
According to your thinking, remorse, learning and growth within an individual is for naught, as you can only be judged on your worst past deeds.
de Klerk was raised within an Afrikaans racist background, he was a product of his
upbringing; BUT as he grew, he came to reject much of that upbringing and what he had been taught to believe. And given his eventually position as President of South Africa, that takes a man of ultimately good and decent character.
As for Mandela; it always amazes me how people can turn around and point fingers at a man who was persecuted, labled and jailed for 20 years of his life just for being black. The ANC tried PEACE -- it
never worked. Do I agree with what happened. No. Do I like what happened? No. But I understand it.
How did the Boer's overcome the oppression of the British? How did the Dutch free themselves from the Spanish? How did the US immigrants escape the tyranny of the British?
When peaceful means fail, the only option left to the oppressed is violence. It has been that way throughout history.
Through your logic, the black people of SA should just have remained under the thumb and command of the whites forever as third class "citizens".
All that was asked for was the right to equality. It was continually denied.
What would you have done?