Durban – “This has really opened my eyes. When I e-mailed them (Makro) I saw they weren’t solving the problem and they were saying that what they are doing is correct as long as it is 75% mutton. But it’s not right, it should say on the front ‘contains pork’ especially for old people who can’t read the fine print,” Naicker said.
Makro spokesperson Annaleigh Vallie said the sausage was manufactured and labelled “fully compliant” with regulated species sausage standards, but the retailer had asked its supplier to highlight the presence of pork.
“The fact that the product contains pork is clearly indicated on the product label as per the labelling regulations. The sausage is not marketed or labelled as “100%” or “pure” mutton, both important descriptors that would indicate the absence of any other meat species in the product, including pork,” she said.
“The sausage contains 82% mutton, which exceeds the minimum regulatory requirement by 7%. In line with regulatory requirements, the presence of pork in the sausage is clearly indicated on the product labelling. The use of pork casings in the manufacture of ‘species’ sausages is standard butchery practice. We have, however, asked and the supplier has agreed to place additional emphasis on the label to indicate the use of pork casings.”
Emam Bux Meats Wholesale and Retail manager Stavros Pillay said there was “definitely a need to change regulations”.
“A sausage can be 75% mutton, beef or pork which is absolutely wrong, it is misleading. If it is labelled mutton it must contain mutton all the way,” Pillay said.
More at: http://www.iol.co.za/news/south-afr...r-over-pork-casing-on-mutton-sausages-7501747