Anyone with physio, chiro or personal training experience?

Don't think that you can just go 'try' a chiro... Maybe shoulder would be fine - but I definitely picked up permanent damage from a chiro. My neck now sounds like rice crispies and doesn't rotate as well as it used to.
And this is a chiro whom people singing praises to - every second person seems to think that they needed to go and he fixed them.
 
Don't think that you can just go 'try' a chiro... Maybe shoulder would be fine - but I definitely picked up permanent damage from a chiro. My neck now sounds like rice crispies and doesn't rotate as well as it used to.
And this is a chiro whom people singing praises to - every second person seems to think that they needed to go and he fixed them.
As with anything I think it depends on who you go to and how well they understand their job. As I said above, the trip to the chiro sorted me out, but I'm sure that's not the case for everyone.
 
Try alternating hot and cold and topical arnica.
 
How does a bio kinetisist fit into the picture?

Biokinetisist vs Physio?

Fro my understanding, the Biokineticist is the fitness guy who'll put you on an exercise regiment that help in the post injury rehabilitation process.
 
So always physio first?

Not necessarily, everyone's situation is different.
With regards to my injury. I went to a GP, who later told me to see a physio. After two sessions of physiotherapy, the physio referred me to a neurologist. Which turned out to be the right call.
 
Fro my understanding, the Biokineticist is the fitness guy who'll put you on an exercise regiment that help in the post injury rehabilitation process.

Actually, a biokineticist does rehabilitation of existing injuries and they're even better equipped than a physio to do that.
 
Actually, a biokineticist does rehabilitation of existing injuries and they're even better equipped than a physio to do that.
Why do we even have physios then, you are implying biokineticist have the same skillset plus more?
 
How does a bio kinetisist fit into the picture?

Biokinetisist vs Physio?

After my injury, I saw a physio for something like 2 months. The purpose of the physio was to help heal the acute injury itself to a point where it was basically functional. In other words, she would massage the injury and give me homework exercises to help the injury heal proper and start rebuilding the muscle.

When the injury reaches a certain point of recovery, the physio is not much use. When there is no trauma so to speak. After that, you see a bio, and she is the one that makes sure everything is working together. In other words, the bio won't just look at your shoulder, but anything that connects to it. A bio looks at your functioning in the real world and whether you are likely to have problems later in life. They will also give you homework to do, to continue rebuilding it.

You don't even necessarily need an injury to see a bio. For instance, you could have an imbalance in your leg muscles or something that is causing you hip pain. A bio will look at the way you walk, sit, step etc etc and find out what is causing the hip pain, then suggest corrective action. It might not have been an injury that caused it in the first place, could just be movement patterns.
 
Why do we even have physios then, you are implying biokineticist have the same skillset plus more?

They have different scopes of practice. A physio works mostly in a hospital setting and has limited equipment available to do joint rehabilitation. Plus, their scope is rehabilitation to a point where there is no or little pain.

A biokineticist would then take over at this point to achieve an almost perfect restoration of joint mobility or muscle imbalance or whatever the problem is. It's all about scope of practice.

Tip: If there's something wrong with your musculature or joint mobility and you have discomfort but not pain, a bio would be the better option.
 
Why do we even have physios then, you are implying biokineticist have the same skillset plus more?

A biokin shows you how to prevent injuries but it's the physio that actually deals with pain.

After my injury, I saw a physio for something like 2 months. The purpose of the physio was to help heal the acute injury itself to a point where it was basically functional. In other words, she would massage the injury and give me homework exercises to help the injury heal proper and start rebuilding the muscle.

When the injury reaches a certain point of recovery, the physio is not much use. When there is no trauma so to speak. After that, you see a bio, and she is the one that makes sure everything is working together. In other words, the bio won't just look at your shoulder, but anything that connects to it. A bio looks at your functioning in the real world and whether you are likely to have problems later in life. They will also give you homework to do, to continue rebuilding it.

You don't even necessarily need an injury to see a bio. For instance, you could have an imbalance in your leg muscles or something that is causing you hip pain. A bio will look at the way you walk, sit, step etc etc and find out what is causing the hip pain, then suggest corrective action. It might not have been an injury that caused it in the first place, could just be movement patterns.

This pretty much answers that question. It's all about the scope of their practices.
 
As an athlete (competed in a few triathlons etc), I would highly recommend going to see a biokineticist.
But ultimately, I think you should stop doing any arm / shoulder training least for 8 weeks.
 
Thanks for all the info and suggestions guys.

To clarify, this is about a 2 year old injury. It gets aggravated randomly (by which I mean I'm not aware at the time that I've aggravated it).

I'll see a biokin and get some assistance.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X