Apple iPhone 18 series thread

Struggling to think of why I would need to upgrade from my existing 16Pro.

Siri AI is still hugely undercooked by all accounts even on the superior hardware of the 18.

So still very much in ‘wait and see’ mode here
 
Complaining about the filesystem? What year is it lol.
Lol, true but it is a fair point for people who are on the fence about leaving Android for iOS.
I still find the iOS File System a little wild, I’ve owned Androids since 2010 and iOS devices since 2012, if I remember correctly the iOS “Files” app came in around iOS 10? It has been a weird experience with it ever since, I think the likes of Symbian, Windows Mobile (6.5 and down/pre 7 WP) and Android have had/have far more intuitive file systems.
Even the MacOS system makes a lot more sense, Apple need to rethink the iOS or completely forget it, IMO.

The pricey 1TB and 2TB iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max found to use very slow memory

The iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max last year introduced a 2TB storage tier. Just like them, the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max are available in four configurations: 256GB, 512GB, 1TB and 2TB. Something has changed, however, and it is the type of storage used. In a video on BiliBili, Homolab compared two 18 Pro Max phones, one with 512GB storage and one with 1TB.

Apparently, the 256GB and 512GB Pro models use TLC flash – each memory cell fits three bits. However, the 1TB and 2TB models use QLC – four bits per memory cell. QLC is known to be slow, so Apple added a fast SLC cache (one bit per cell), followed by a TLC cache and then the QLC bulk storage.

That works well until it doesn’t. In the tests, the SLC cache could sustain write speeds of up to 3,000MB/s. But once it’s filled up, the phone starts writing to its TLC cache, which is slower but still respectable at 578MB/s. And once both levels of cache are full, the phone goes to the QLC storage that only manages 79.4MB/s with dips to 25.6MB/s.

This is while the storage is empty, when the SLC cache is 250GB. But once storage starts to fill up, the size of the cache shrinks – at 60% storage used, the SLC cache is only 58GB. The TLC and QLC memories get similarly filled up and they become slower too.

Homolab’s measurements at 60% storage used show 396MB/s for the TLC cache and an abysmal 1.1MB/s for the QLC storage. Again, this is for sustained writes.



It is crazy to me that the more expensive models got this treatment.
512GB seems to be the best option in terms of “future proofing” and storage speed.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X