Space_Chief
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2012
- Messages
- 12,949
- Reaction score
- 4
You are being rather flippant towards instinct considering your preference to track record and practicality over theory.
Fear can be a relevant and legitimate variable with which to make decisions.
For example..
The majority of the world is a hell of a lot more conservative than American republicans. An irrational level of fear is driving hordes, and non conservatives still think they are untouchable. As the west continues to decline, that illusion is going to be shattered more frequently. Really they should be more afraid than they are.
What's more is that the US conservatives are used as a bogey man to help drive votes for Dem voters.
And most liberals, at least internet liberals, are ideologues. They are dogmatic in following their ideology and won't budge to ever consider the other side in a fair way. They moan about compassion and without compassion attack those with whom they disagree labeling them as bigots, racists, homophobes, etc, even people who are clearly not so, but poisoning the well is a great tactic.
Risk aversity is an important variable to drive decision making too. It's perfectly valid. In fact those who are more afraid tend to do better, they wear their seat-belts, drive slower, get into fewer fights, do less risky sports - and have lower insurance premiums, etc.
Of course there are times when one needs to take risks, and many conservative people do seem to be able to do that well enough - as judged by those who go into business ventures and make fortunes that way.