So much objective distance and logic in an over-simplified argument, how could this possibly be a thread about the I/P conflict on a forum with so much false dichtomic arguing?
Sarcasm aside, I'd actually like to hear a well reasoned argument for why Israel is claimed to have stolen land being the source of all of this and why Israel's establishment is such a sore thumb on the ego of its Arab neighbours with the whole spectrum from elect goverments, primary school teachers and nutcase mullah's seeking from removal to the genocide of these jews?
As far as I can tell, nationalistic aspirations were pursued by both some Arab tribes (following servitude under turkish ottoman rule) as well as Jews in the area (with increasing immigration especially post holocaust and again after neighbouring arab states relocated jews). The arabs started an armed uprising against jews, especially new arrivals and the civil strife led Britain to divide the warring groups similarly to India/Pakistan.
