Article: Malema complains about intimidation

rainynight65 said:
I saw a poster yesterday for this 'Economic Freedom March'. Again, it's jkust demand, demand, demand. We want. When are these guys actually going to start working for what they want?
Click to expand...

The ones in PTA? Yea.. saw them. I like .. WE DEMAND!! No work... work is bad...
 
He is the last person in RSA to point fingers about intimidation.............
 
phaktza said:
It was no just proposed, it was ruled upon in court

However, I am unsure if this would apply to the ANC YL as it is not a trade union. As such, the precedent has been set for any marches or strikes and a court would find against the league were the taken to court.

So it is now de facto standard practice, yes.
Click to expand...
It says in the article "trade unions can be held liable for damage caused by workers during strikes.". But there's nowhere where it says unions must pay a deposit before they can strike.
 
Redeemed said:
It says in the article "trade unions can be held liable for damage caused by workers during strikes.". But there's nowhere where it says unions must pay a deposit before they can strike.
Click to expand...

And that, my friend, is interpretation of law. Don't like it? Then back to court we go as the metro police have the capacity to stop any march.
 
phaktza - 25-10-2011, 08:46 PM And that, my friend, is interpretation of law. Don't like it? Then back to court we go as the metro police have the capacity to stop any march.
Click to expand...
You must be joking - but would like to see them try stop this one
 
BBSA said:
It is a deposit to recover from if there are any damages caused by the protesters.
Click to expand...

I'd love to know how they handle the logistics of managing something like this...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X