We've done this time and time again. You will not win this argument. The industry has been under pressure, as has every other bloody industry in the country. Analysts have called for across-the-board spending cuts in every sector of the economy. They could cushion the increased cost-burden on condition that prices stabilised, but government refused to intervene in this respect when approached by the industry as a whole. They could cushion increased cost burdens had government stepped in to address labour unrest. They could cushion cost burden increases had output been able to increase and had government setup bilateral trade agreements with resources-importing countries - they refused.
Now take increased cost of extraction, massive hikes in the largest non-capex expenditure of the company, lower output, lower efficiency, and combine it with problems relating to investor confidence and you have a disaster on your hands. The government not only did nothing to assist in any of these aspects, but in fact were the catalysts and protagonists on all fronts. To claim that the government, and specifically the minister is not to blame is fscking pathetic...