O like ISIS and ISIL?
We need all the rats to come out of their holes before we plug the holes![]()
I googled "woolworths rat"
https://www.google.co.za/search?q=w...hannel=sb&gfe_rd=cr&ei=tT9rVJ2yKoOp8wehuoLoAg
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
O like ISIS and ISIL?
We need all the rats to come out of their holes before we plug the holes![]()
I don't see why I am forced to buy halal goods when 99% of shoppers at the local WW are not muslim.
The briefing was attended by Nadia Hassan, representing a group of businessmen who hold shares in Woolworths, a Jewish human rights activist representing a Jewish Woolworths shareholder, a representative for Stellenbosch-based author and writer Marthie Momberg who owns shares in Woolworths, Congress of the SA Trade Unions spokesman Patrick Craven, and BDS SA national co-ordinator Muhammed Desai.
Desai said they were not at liberty to disclose how many shares those who supported the boycott held.
He said BDS SA and its partners bought between 40 and 50 individual shares in order to attend the company's annual general meeting, to be held in Cape Town on November 26.
they are not regular shareholders having purchased shares in a company for investment purposes:Why is everyone assuming these people own few shares?
BDS SA's Muhammed Desai said they had bought shares in Woolworths to be able to attend the annual general meeting
referring to me, or addressing me ?I bet grantza would not want people to raise concerns at shareholder meetings, right? Or only about issues you agree with?
Ah, so my suspicions are correct, Hassan, also a shareholder, is representing the people I previously mentioned, so let us call them partners:
Outdoor activism today, activist shareholder tomorrow...
they are not regular shareholders having purchased shares in a company for investment purposes:
referring to me, or addressing me ?
if the politicians are getting involved then there must be an angle. who is going to gain by hammering woolworths?
OK, I missed that.
Both. Do you think rules should be different depending on what the shareholder in question's ideology is?
If they all bought 50 shares, they spend like R4000
That doesn't really represent the majority of shareholders.
i keep going further back in the thread, but remain unsure as to which rules you are referring to.
I agree.
Even if marine and his pitbull decides to throw all their money at Woolworths it will be in vain.
Negative publicity breeds negative publicity.
Various Woolworths shareholders indicated on Tuesday they supported the boycott against the retailer.
You can view the page at http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/content.php/9279-Woolworths-boycott-backed-by-shareholders
You lamented the rule that shareholders could bring up issues at shareholder meetings.
therein lies the rub
anyone holding shares (even one) in a jse listed company is entitled to attend the agm of the company.
so they are not a group holding large volumes of shares & wielding influence of any sort, they simply bought a share or two - as an entrance ticket to the agm
BDS SA's Muhammed Desai said they had bought shares in Woolworths to be able to attend the annual general meeting and raise "ethical issues".
equally, one can buy a share or two in telkom sa, & thus be entitled to attend the agm and raise concerns