Bandwidth, music and piracy

it's difficult in .za

eMusic stopped selling here (with a bunch of my credits disappearing along with that decision)

no ITMS, Pandora, Spotify, Amazon music etc.

If there was a decent download service available that stocked the music i liked I'd use it.
 
it's difficult in .za

eMusic stopped selling here (with a bunch of my credits disappearing along with that decision)

no ITMS, Pandora, Spotify, Amazon music etc.

If there was a decent download service available that stocked the music i liked I'd use it.

What I don't understand is WHY, if Amazon can ship music CDs of Britney Spears (ie their entire catalog) to US in SA they can't allow SA's to download music (the same music they're selling us in CD format)?
 
This should separate the backing tape bimbos from the muso's who actually have talent.

I agree - and, with more live performances to choose from, costs could come down as artists start competing for audiences.
 
Question...

One day I am listening to the radio...

I hear a song I like... The anchor says sms "Blah" to XXXXX and recieve this song on your phone now. SMS's cost R16...

When all is said and done... I have legitimately purchased the song. The chances of me remembering where I got that mp3 is near impossible...

Where does that leave so called 'piracy'?
 
online is the way to go, i bought music online drm free at R3, maybe cause it's was a local band but pay for what you want a cheap price seems a good idea
 
No bands ever got rich selling albums, they toured example: Rolling Stones, they merchandised example: Rolling Stones, AC/DC ect. Years ago musicians had to work for their money. Not record someones elses song, put alot of girls in bikinis and try to get the persons with money (teenagers) to buy their crappy albums. VIVA LA TOURS.
 
Not sure about bands not getting rich selling albums. I've heard this thrown around a lot. You'd have to show me the breakdown of a famous band's income statement. Royalties for advertising, movies, radio playback etc. certainly contributes, but there's still CD's on the shelf for a reason. Money from concerts? Maybe... but I don't see mass-market margins happening there.

There are very few drm free choices for non-britney fans in SA. Our CD selection is pretty mainstream. grooveshark is probably the best pre-listening service, not sure why it hasn't been shut down yet...

The battle is really between technology companies, who own the customer base (apple / amazon) and record labels, who own the media rights. Record labels hold on to DRM in order to hold resellers to ransom and maintain their monopoly of the market. In the case of iTunes, Apple took a really bold step. And others followed suit. Resellers need to get as many clients as they can and then use that as leverage against the record labels. You and I need to make them aware of their power against labels and responsibilities to consumers. Of course users will chose piracy vs DRM if they don't have a non-drm choice. It's a no-brainer.

Please can somebody show me the figures of the iTunes store post-drm removal. My suspicion is that it's still as popular as ever and customers are happy to keep paying. I couldn't find any google results on the matter.

The whole music paradigm is going to have to change radically in the next few years. Hopefully consumers will kill off traditional record labels or technology houses will buy them out and kill them off.

It think this is the last anti-DRM post I write. I'm getting sick of the whole issue now.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X