Bots surf the web more than humans

If we define "surfing the web" as actually having experience of the www, then bots don't surf at all. Crawlers just process links. They are not conscious of what's going on. Unlike people who surf the web.

So I disagree with the article. As a person who surfs the web, no bot does the same as me. Bot traffic may be the majority but that's not what everyone thinks of when we use the phrase "surf the web".
 
This vision of the future comes to mind after reading that.
And so viruses begat filters; filters begat polymorphic counteragents; polymorphic counteragents begat an arms race. Not to mention the worms and the 'bots and the single-minded autonomous datahounds—so essential for legitimate commerce, so vital to the well-being of every institution, but so needy, so demanding of access to protected memory. And way over there in left field, the Artificial Life geeks were busy with their Core Wars and their Tierra models and their genetic algorithms. It was only a matter of time before everyone got tired of endlessly reprogramming their minions against each other. Why not just build in some genes, a random number generator or two for variation, and let natural selection do the work?

The problem with natural selection, of course, is that it changes things.

The problem with natural selection in networks is that things change fast.

By the time Achilles Desjardins became a 'lawbreaker, Onion was a name in decline. One look inside would tell you why. If you could watch the fornication and predation and speciation without going grand mal from the rate-of-change, you knew that there was only one word that really fit: Maelstrom.
From Maelstrom, by Peter Watts.
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X