That's bull$**** if I've even heard it. If a bouncer gets put down, 'he got what he deserved', be it the other way around, 'he behaved like a steroid-fuelled neanderthal'. I've seen normal bouncers (no roids) struggle with drunked coked up steroid jocks, and nobody said a thing. Now had this been the other way around, everyone would have been up in arms.
I am not talking about whether the bouncer deserves it or not. I am talking about the guys who deliberately go looking to take a bouncer out. It isn't a case of the bouncer looking for trouble and then been taken down, it's the deliberate targeting of the bouncer.
Closest example that I can give you that you may be able to reference is by Francois Pienaar in his book. He says that he and others went to deliberately look for a fight.
That's what I am talking about.
And that possibility puts bouncers on an edge.
And if the bouncer does stop some drugged up jock, well that's his job and why should he get praise? The question that people are asking is why is it that the bouncers seem to need to beat up on the nerdy types?
This isn't to say that there isn't a role for security at a club. Who would go if the coked up steroid jocks could rampage?
But I guess that there is a question in why clubs have bouncers and not restuarants or pubs? Somewhere along the line the 'wrong' behaviours are present in clubs, and maybe those involved in it all deserve each other?