TwoCents1000
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2010
- Messages
- 198
- Reaction score
- 0
Yes, the first complaint about making speed claims upheld by the ASA was against iBurst (or WBS as you like to call them) in July 2007.Didn't someone run to the ASA complaining about those speeds being used as a metric?
A few months earlier, in 2006, the ASA also ruled iBurst/WBS may not call it's network broadband.
Both these rulings still stand.
After the ruling against iBurst, similar "up to" complaints were lodged, and upheld by the ASA, against most telecoms providers including Vodacom, MTN, Telkom and Cell C.
Telkom got theirs overturned so they can make speed claims. A "broadband" complaint against Vodacom was also overturned last year.
Speedtest.net does not report iBurst as an ISP and the ISP that it does report has more than a thousand pairs of radios capable of true sustained broadband speeds that does equate to the averages you mentioned earlier.
Really? That's your argument? You base it on the fact the speedtest.net reports iBurst as Wireless Business Solutions (WBS) and not as iBurst?
That's really weak, try not to argue for the sake of arguing.