MickeyD
RIP
Next 4?lol, the next 4 at least !
Hmmmm..... one will be mine, one for Gary and one for cerebus... so there is still one spot left.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Next 4?lol, the next 4 at least !
The competition winners are selected using a simple formula which is ‘relatively random’. The reason why we do not use a random number generator is that it is not possible to objectively confirm how the winners were selected. With the current system anyone can verify that the winners were selected using a fair system. If there is ever a reason to suspect otherwise, we will be glad to have anyone check the results.
Next 4?
Hmmmm..... one will be mine, one for Gary and one for cerebus... so there is still one spot left.
Do yo mean to say that you could never be 100% sure that whoever coded the generator didn't somehow 'load the dice'?The reason why we do not use a random number generator is that it is not possible to objectively confirm how the winners were selected.
No. I would say that all post numbers in the comp thread are entered into the draw and if a clone is randomly selected then there is a redraw.Do yo mean to say that you could never be 100% sure that whoever coded the generator didn't somehow 'load the dice'?
No. I would say that all post numbers in the comp thread are entered into the draw and if a clone is randomly selected then there is a redraw.
****ing hell, what a bunch of tinfoil-hat whingers...
Next 4?
Hmmmm..... one will be mine, one for Gary and one for cerebus... so there is still one spot left.
Easy to say that when you're a previous benefactor. And for the record, I'm happy to forfeit any future 'random' competitions in saying that I'm not interesting in winning, I'm interested in transparency in a competition that doesn't indicate that it's anything but random but in truth it's selection is fairly frequent.
Presuming that there'd be some reason to manipulate anything, I can't imagine the site risking the guaranteed PR disaster it would be, by doing so. More-so, I would think that the competitions are also focussed on drawing in new members, so I can't imagine why they would select specific prolific members. To what end?
Humans tend to look for patterns, it's what we are built to do. More often than not there are people I've never heard of before winning stuff.
I'd like to think, also, that my attitude is one of rationality, not borne of having won a thing or two....
Presuming that there'd be some reason to manipulate anything, I can't imagine the site risking the guaranteed PR disaster it would be, by doing so. More-so, I would think that the competitions are also focussed on drawing in new members, so I can't imagine why they would select specific prolific members. To what end?
Humans tend to look for patterns, it's what we are built to do. More often than not there are people I've never heard of before winning stuff.
I'd like to think, also, that my attitude is one of rationality, not borne of having won a thing or two....
You are biased hence you may not post an opinion.![]()
Don't you deflect now, you bloody favoured-son of the forum.![]()
MickeyD has at least earned most of his prizes thanks to "Forum member of the year" type competitions (as well as previous milestone total posts competitions)
Shhhh... dammit, you're spoiling the conspiracy theory!![]()