They actually said they "absolutely no plans to support other optical formats"
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/01/18/ms_says_no_xbox_360_blu-ray/
Which is substantially different, and doesn't exclude the possibility.
The "no games" issue Retro isn't just about being able to rattle off a list of games. Firstly, not all games appeal to all people, secondly, most of those games are second rate ports of 360 titles, which thirdly, as new, are more expensive on the PS3, and some even lack online options already available. Fourthly nothing on the PS3 really stands out, let alone being "killer apps". Motorstorm, is just dusty Burnout (got) and Resistance is just a shooter, which well, we know the 360's rep. Which leaves? "flow", I think . . .
If you don't own a console and are looking at which to buy based on the games available, or you have both consoles and need to decide which platform to play your cross platform titles, the 360 wins hands down in both cases.
to the PS3's 50, there are already 200 games available on the 360, but more importantly look the new release schedule. How many PS3 releases are there this week? Last Week? How about the whole of April? This week we're in the middle of the traditional spring "drought" and the 360 has 2 AAA's and a B rate title, not to mention 6-8 arcade titles. The PS3 has, uh, none.
Right now? You're buying a Blu-ray player that, provided you don't have the better alternative, can sort of play games.
You don't even have to believe me. All you need to do is look at the figures. In Japan the 360 Software outsold the PS3 last week, IN JAPAN! Meanwhile in the US 360 software is outselling the PS
2. Just think about that.
And @tan - Toyota makes a heck of a lot more money, doesn't have to be floated by other company divisions, and people get a lot more bang for their buck in a Toyota. The folks buying the ferrari's are the one's with more money than sense.