South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
The 7D is $700 more than a used Mk2N or 50D. I'm on a tight budget and this is on top of the 400mm f/2.8 non IS with 1.4x extender.Why are you considering the 50D?
What's the price for the 1D Mkiin? Is it close to a new 7D, that might be another option and the one I would go for given the choice between the 3.
Dont be silly.Nikon D3S?![]()
Tripods aren't particularly practical.6KG?You might have to skip the extra body and get a heavier tripod!
![]()
That list never seems to want to end . . .If you now throw in the 7D, I would get that hands down. The day I played with it at the launch with Canon almost made me buy it. The only thing it
still needs is a FF for me.
The ISO is amazing, almost on par with 5DmkII
AF systems is out of this world.
Good solid framerate.
and its a crop.
What more do you need.
I am leaning towards the 7D - it will be nice to have as a general backup and will be handy with my 24/70 or 70-200 on it. I'm just concerned about the build quality not being as solid as the 1D.
Price is my main concern. I need a second< durable, body for my smaller lenses when I'm using the 400mm on my 1DMk3For me the 1d bodies are just too big. If I was choosing (or if I had the cash), I'd buy a 7d today. AFAIK, it does have a bigger feature set than the 1dm2
You'd be surprised how quickly one camera gets put down when the action picks up and you're reaching for a different one.It's similar to the 50D, with better weather sealing. It's a lot sturdier than the Rebels. I don't think you have anything to worry about.