China - Taiwan Developments

So how come public Universities don't cater for Zulu or Xhosa? Is that discrimination too?


What external forces? I mean they have been around since 1991, clearly they don't care if people make snide comments about them, especially on a tech forum site.



I don't harbour any ill will against minorities.. Ask the Uyghurs how the feel about being a minority under Chinese rule..
Public universities don't cater to Zulu because it hasn't been academically developed by Zulus themselves. This is also a ridiculous argument. For some reason, since Zulus didn't develop their language, my language must be excluded, and we should all be educated in your language? So my human right to learn in my own language, must be taken away, so that Zulus and others like yourself feel better about it? Thanks for proving my point about human rights.

External forces such as the government constantly threatening to make their form of existence unconstitutional:

This excludes constant EFF, BLF, and other ANC references to Orania, and disinheriting them of their land considering them racists for practicing their human rights.

You're also quite disingenuous, you propagate hatred and disdain, literal dehumanization of people who associate with Orania, which is a form of ethnic discrimination. When you encourage ethnic discrimination, aren't your encouraging violence towards them which could escalate to what happens on the farms or what happened to the minority in Rwanda?

You don't harbor ill-will against any minorities, just the Afrikaans minority, who you want to not learn in their native language which we took the time to academically develop (which violates our human rights), whom you also consider inferior to you since a portion of them prefer to associate with their own people in places like Orania. So you can make reference to the Uyghurs pertaining to China, who put them in concentration and re-education camps, just as your English ancestors did to my ancestors ironically, yet such a reference is once again dishonest, since you partake in ethnic discrimination in this country, and revel in the oppression (quite literally according to UN law) of a minority here.

At the end of the day, all you are is a hypocrite.
 
Let's just rephrase that " I don't harbour any ill will against minorities...Ask the Russian speaking people ( in the Donbass ) how it feels being a minority under the Ukraine regime.
He supports the Ukrainian shelling of Russian civilians, discrimination and disenfranchisement of Afrikaans people in this country. Literal bigot.
 
@Nicodeamus this thread is the

China - Taiwan Developments thread.​

If you wish to create a "Most whites left school at standard 8 in the 80's" thread, then please do so in the relevant forum section.

You habitually (and most likely deliberately) derail threads with pages of non-relevant rubbish.
 
Population growth rate =! birth rate, but I am sure you knew that already....
Interesting factoid here for you,


i.e. deaths caught up with births by the 1990s, Always remember this model below when working with populations.
View attachment 1361871
You didn't catch the sarcasm. Your basic maths was way off. Now you're diverting to completely irrelevant, unrelated data. Seems to be a pattern with many of your posts on here.
 
You didn't catch the sarcasm. Your basic maths was way off. Now you're diverting to completely irrelevant, unrelated data. Seems to be a pattern with many of your posts on here.

you're confusing population growth rate with the population birth rate, they aren't the same.
Secondly, there is nothing wrong with comparing two groups that are 2 years apart, as we have seen the added children is at best 2% of the population growth (less if you take into account that deaths might have caught up with births)
 
You didn't catch the sarcasm. Your basic maths was way off. Now you're diverting to completely irrelevant, unrelated data. Seems to be a pattern with many of your posts on here.
"Your basic math is way off" "But I'm not going to take the time to prove that it's way off" hur dur.
 
"Your basic math is way off" "But I'm not going to take the time to prove that it's way off" hur dur.

he was right that my sumpump failed me earlier on, but the general principle holds. Take the ratio of STD8 to STD10 and assume that the kids are about the same.
 
PLA launches recruitment with priority on students in science, tech majors, with skills for actual combat

According to the CCTV report, so far, more than 110,000 people applied to join the army in the second half of this year in East China's Zhejiang Province, among whom 50,000 were college students and another 27,000 were college graduates.

Chinese netizens also expressed their enthusiasm to join the army on Monday. Related hashtags on Sina Weibo had been viewed about nearly 100 million times as of Monday afternoon.

"Can they relax the age restriction to 36? I want to contribute to the reunification of our motherland!" said a Weibo user.

"I will apply to join the army after I become a postgraduate student and learn more technologies to serve the country," said another.
 
Public universities don't cater to Zulu because it hasn't been academically developed by Zulus themselves. This is also a ridiculous argument. For some reason, since Zulus didn't develop their language, my language must be excluded, and we should all be educated in your language? So my human right to learn in my own language, must be taken away, so that Zulus and others like yourself feel better about it? Thanks for proving my point about human rights.
Where you asleep when during apartheid? Do you remember when Afrikaans was promoted as the default language of instruction for black students yet it's a complete mystery why their language wasn't developed like Afrikaans... :X3:

This excludes constant EFF, BLF, and other ANC references to Orania, and disinheriting them of their land considering them racists for practicing their human rights.
EFF and the BLF are both minority parties but surely it's their right to express their opinion? Just like it's the right of people in Orania to choose to live amongst other Afrikaners? I mean, Orania have their little town, it seems a bity much to expect that everyone else in the country would automatically agree with it?


You're also quite disingenuous, you propagate hatred and disdain, literal dehumanization of people who associate with Orania, which is a form of ethnic discrimination. When you encourage ethnic discrimination, aren't your encouraging violence towards them which could escalate to what happens on the farms or what happened to the minority in Rwanda?
Please quote one of my posts where I propagate hatred and distain against the people of Orania...

You don't harbor ill-will against any minorities, just the Afrikaans minority, who you want to not learn in their native language which we took the time to academically develop (which violates our human rights), whom you also consider inferior to you since a portion of them prefer to associate with their own people in places like Orania.
You throw around accusations but you have precious little evidence, where did I ever call Afrikaans people inferior?

So you can make reference to the Uyghurs pertaining to China, who put them in concentration and re-education camps, just as your English ancestors did to my ancestors ironically,
Hate to break it to your, only one side of my family actually has British ancestry, and they where Welsh.

yet such a reference is once again dishonest, since you partake in ethnic discrimination in this country, and revel in the oppression (quite literally according to UN law) of a minority here.

At the end of the day, all you are is a hypocrite.
That's quite the chip on your shoulder... Perhaps it's time to let go of your persecution complex, it seems to be dominating your life.
 
Last edited:
Therefore you can spew all your nonsense about your "Western" human rights, but they clearly aren't implemented when you have countries targeting minorities, targeting women, etc. So China replacing you makes zero difference in the world, except that you have less people to invade and slaughter.
He works on the assumption that everyone wants the so called western democracy. Asians, Africans, Muslims...

That's why when the US overthrows governments, it rarely works out.
 
He works on the assumption that everyone wants the so called western democracy. Asians, Africans, Muslims...

That's why when the US overthrows governments, it rarely works out.

The problem is that they aren't consistent in promoting human rights and democracy. The US overthrew the democratically elected regimes in Guatemala, El Salvador, Chille and Iran and let their strategic allies in Indonesia murder 1/4 of the population of east timor.

If they actually had a Marshall Plan for Iraq then perhaps critiques won't be as cynical today.
 
Last edited:

The reaction to Russian atrocities in Ukraine stands in stark contrast to the lackluster response to the Chinese government's repression in Xinjiang. There, aided by the world's most intrusive surveillance state, Beijing has detained one million Uyghur and other Turkic Muslims to force them to abandon their religion, language, and culture. Human Rights Watch and others have concluded that these mass detentions and other systematic abuses against the minority population in Xinjiang amount to crimes against humanity. And that is just one aspect of the worst repression nationwide in China since the 1989 massacre of Tiananmen Square pro-democracy protesters.
 
Agree, that was horrific, but the Western world isn't solely about the behaviour of the US, and plenty of Western states refused to back that invasion.
So according to your own admission, the US invades Iraq and invaded without the support of other countries. As a direct result, up to 1 million of people died.

What then gives them the moral right to criticise Russia, never mind China?
 

Titled U.S. Commits Serious Crimes of Violating Human Rights in the Middle East and Beyond (full text), the CSHRS report focused on Washington's systematic violations of human rights, including launching wars, massacring civilians, and damaging the right to life and survival; forced transformation, unilateral sanctions, severe infringement of people's rights to development, life and health; creating "clash of civilizations" and abusing imprisonment and torture, and violating freedom of religion and human dignity.

It underlined that the United States has committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, arbitrary detention, abuse of torture, torture of prisoners, and indiscriminate unilateral sanctions in the Middle East and surrounding areas.

Facts show that the United States has seriously violated the basic human rights of people in the Middle East and other places, causing permanent damage and irreparable losses to countries and people in the region, the report said.
 
So according to your own admission, the US invades Iraq and invaded without the support of other countries. As a direct result, up to 1 million of people died.

What then gives them the moral right to criticise Russia, never mind China?

You don't even have to go all back to Iraq. The US and the UK gave both military abd diplomatic support for Saudi Arabia's genocide in Yemen, that is currently occurring.

Buying Russian gas is immoral, but do load the Saudi Oil..
 
Capability isn't determined by your equipment, which is why you have to resort to making excuses for yet another American loss. Don't forget your heroes got ****ed up in Vietnam too. The most important thing in a war isn't necessarily technology, it's ideology. The overarching "Western" ideal is weak and submissive, it isn't virile enough to compete with ideals such as radical communism in Vietnam, or radical Islamic fundamentalism.

One has an ideal where it conquers and rules over others, the other has an ideal where it bends over backwards to accommodate others. All the technology in the world can't make up for the philosophical power disparity.

Easily whips any nation's ass huh? I don't think you're intelligent enough to speak on the matter. So you're implying, the massive disparity enjoyed by the USA compared to Iraq is present in China? Nope. And yet in other instances of disparity they have lost, see Vietnam, and today Afghanistan.

You can claim that "oh they conquered Afghanistan, they won the war", but if they won the war the Taliban wouldn't rule right now. A war is a long-term thing, take for instance the 100 years war, the victor was ultimately France, which unified its territory and kicked the English out of it, even though early on they were losing key battles.

The USA isn't known for military efficiency, which is why they struggle to dominate smaller nations, their only advantages historically have been numerical and technological, today that's no longer a factor. Face it, your Anglosphere has lost and China is the boss, and there's nothing you can do about it.

You're delusional.
 
So according to your own admission, the US invades Iraq and invaded without the support of other countries. As a direct result, up to 1 million of people died.

What then gives them the moral right to criticise Russia, never mind China?
Why is it every conversation with you lot ends in "USA bad!"?

I am not from the US, i don't have to answer for their mistakes when I call out Russia and China for their sh*tty behavior.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X