China - Taiwan Developments

I know we're in China thread, but what you're saying is that if Russia withdraws from Ukraine, then regroups and ends up controlling the country, Ukraine has actually won the war?

The US was never in control in Afghanistan. The conflict never ended. That's what winning means. Their famous debacle at Kabul airport during their withdrawal is a case in point.

The US was in complete control of Afghanistan. There we minor IED incidents but all decisions were nade between the US and the Afghan government. Conflict ending doesn't mean a side won. There is always conflict after a war. It's called partisanship.
 
Even the US president disagrees with you. According to him, the war that (according to you ended on 2001) apparently only ended in 2021.

The longest war in history.

And the government they put in place could not defend themselves either. What a win!!


Officially ended for the US. There is still war in Afghanistan.
 
Once again. an anti USA site. When are you going to present a balanced view?

Please stop with the mediabias nonsense.
You realise that IS a more balanced view? It's less biased than CNN, FOX or MSNBC and it has a higher factual rating.
Don't be blinded by perceived bias, the more important factor is the factual rating.
 
Please stop with the mediabias nonsense.
You realise that IS a more balanced view? It's less biased than CNN, FOX or MSNBC and it has a higher factual rating.
Don't be blinded by perceived bias, the more important factor is the factual rating.

Then find a better media bias fact checker. You're aware the one I use is used worldwide by universities?

Media Bias Fact Check as a Source: Universities and Libraries​



Media Bias Fact Check is frequently used as a resource for Educational Institutions and Libraries. Below is a shortlist of the top 10 institutions that use MBFC as an educational resource.

 
Please, tell us about the reforms?

Before commenting, ensure you know what you are talking about.



 
Then find a better media bias fact checker. You're aware the one I use is used worldwide by universities?
/snip
It has it's own bias built in, but that's beside the point.

The site you're being critical of has a higher factual rating than major news outlets. It also has less failed fact checks than the NY Times.
So you have zero basis for your allegation.
 
Once again. an anti USA site. When are you going to present a balanced view?


When are you going to stop using a pentagon fact checker and start thinking for yourself?
 
You obviously have no military experience whatsoever. Numbers don't matter.
So more like forever then. They struggled against small insignificant countries and had one victory with the first Gulf War but that was with a proper coalition joining them. Why not tell us about the great victorious wars you were in?
 
So more like forever then. They struggled against small insignificant countries and had one victory with the first Gulf War but that was with a proper coalition joining them. Why not tell us about the great victorious wars you were in?

He has a chip on his soldier and thinks that because he patrolled the SA border in what was mostly a jobs program for poor whites, he somehow is deserving of a special caste status. It's like guys who played Rugby for the first team or were a prefect in high school and then 20 years on are still bragging about it, while everyone else moved on.
 
Last edited:
It has it's own bias built in, but that's beside the point.

The site you're being critical of has a higher factual rating than major news outlets. It also has less failed fact checks than the NY Times.
So you have zero basis for your allegation.

I am mind-boggled how he thinks that a website that is funded by the pentagon is going to be objective when rating an antiwar website that has been running since the first gulf war.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X