Chrysler Crossfire

[Purply]

Is it just me, or does the Chrysler Crossfire still look damn sexy considering it's been around for basically 10 years already?

Drove past one this morning and though to myself, wow that is soooo sexy, must be worth a small fortune.

Turns out you can buy them for anything between 100k-150k, which seems rather cheap.



Or is there something similar looking that is more recent?

 

[WaxLyrical]

Completely agree. Turned my head the other day.

That little spoiler at the back is so damn awesome.

 

[Paul Bedford]

Jeremy Clarkson on the Chrysler Crossfire.

...and the Chrysler Crossfire, which looks like a dog doing a ****. You know - that arched back thing pooches do when they're squeezing one out.

http://www.topgear.com/uk/jeremy-clarkson/clarkson-coupes-2003-03-12

 

[Hemi300c]

Don't do it. Yank cars are great in America.
Fuel consumption and parts are expensive.

 

[Pox]

Don't do it. Yank cars are great in America.
Fuel consumption and parts are expensive.

It's just got yank sheet metal on. Underneath it's a first-generation Mercedes SLK

 

[Purply]

It's a sports car, why on earth would you be worried about fuel consumption

 

[bboy]

looks better to me for a 10 yr old car

 

[Fulcrum29]

Crossfire on the outside, PT Cruiser in the inside.

 

[FiestaST]

Scarce SRT6 buddy!

 

[Sinbad]

Crossfire on the outside, PT Cruiser in the inside.

no, SLK on the inside...

 

[Colin62]

Is it just me, or does the Chrysler Crossfire still look damn sexy considering it's been around for basically 10 years already?

Why would something well designed and appealing suddenly look awful just because ten years have passed? Good design is good design.

 

[Fulcrum29]

no, SLK on the inside...

Haha, more in line with the interior than under the shell.

 

[Colin62]

Crossfire body, PT Cruiser interior and SLK mechanicals?

 

[SauRoNZA]

no, SLK on the inside...

I think he means the plastic dashboard etc.

 

[Fulcrum29]

Crossfire body, PT Cruiser interior and SLK mechanicals?

It has more to do with the quality level, the Crossfire was very poor on quality, 2004 American plastic.

 

[Pox]

I think he means the plastic dashboard etc.

SLK engine, chassis, gearbox, suspension etc.

 

[Colin62]

It has more to do with the quality level, the Crossfire was very poor on quality, 2004 American plastic.

Agreed. And given that you'll pay a similar amount for a SLK or Audi TT that age, I'd rather go with one of those.

 

[Kal86]

The Crossfire is more SLK than Chrysler. Exactly what Sinbad & Pox said.

 

[Fulcrum29]

The Crossfire is more SLK than Chrysler. Exactly what Sinbad & Pox said.

It was an Americanised SLK320.

 

[TehStranger]

Looks ok for what it is, doesn't turn my head. This on the other hand...