I'm sceptical if this thing is actually accurate. Last time I checked with some other company I had no score because I literally had no debt, for the past 6 months I actually started using my lines of credit and now I have a score of 669. Really I haven't spent more used more than 4K of credit over that period and I feel like I'm over estimating the amount by like a lot
They tend to use metrics like “percentage of available credit used”, as big indicators. This means that 0 means no credit, no score. Using all your credit means that you’re a risk. Buying lunch once a month, means that you are super responsible. Even more so if you have many credit cards, but hardly use them.
I suppose that it makes sense to some extent - having credit and not using it, means that you’re not living above your means. Not using credit at all means that you either aren’t able to get it, or don’t know how to use it.
It fits some situations, but not all. I bumped my credit score way up, some 15 years back, by just asking the bank to push up my credit limit every 6 months, even though I only ever used a fix small amount and paid it off completely each month.
My credit score has (amusingly) since dropped, since now I use almost half my credit every month, and no longer have car or home loans contributing to my “available credit”, so my “credit usage ratio” is too high. The reason I am spending more, is that I am making much more (and still pay it off each month). It also means that I don’t need credit anymore, so I don’t really care. It is interesting to see the dynamics though.
Also, doing too many credit checks reduces your score, btw. They assume it is potential lenders checking you out because you need more money you can get from one source.