Coffin assault trial

JustAsk said:
Lol, funny...

Cuz you're blind to the very same thing happened here with the loudmouths on mybb.

White guy doing something - never racist (everything but...),always more to the story, tiny minority
Black guy - pretty much always racist, even genocide, sweeping generalisation

anyways, doesn't suprise me one bit.
Click to expand...

BS, show a few examples or STFU

Most here have rebuked racist attacks from both sides.
 
JustAsk said:
Lol, funny...

Cuz you're blind to the very same thing happened here with the loudmouths on mybb.

White guy doing something - never racist (everything but...),always more to the story, tiny minority
Black guy - pretty much always racist, even genocide, sweeping generalisation

anyways, doesn't suprise me one bit.
Click to expand...

People on MyBB aren't writing national newspaper headlines.
 
ngwe23 said:
Malema is not a racist. I do not think that he considers himself to be superior to white people. He is, however, against white people monopolising capital and the means of production.
Click to expand...
And I understand that and can even sympathise, though I totally disagree with his anaysis of how the situation came about and what we are to do about it.

ngwe23 said:
Side note: Mandela was one called a terrorist. His crime: fighting for black people.
Click to expand...
Careful now. That word "fought" is awfully loaded and equivocal.

Mandela was a called (and convicted of being) a terrorist because he was co-founder and leader in a military organisation (uMkhonto we Sizwe) that actively worked to overthrow the South Africa state by force of arms, which included attacks on public places with civilians.

He was not called a terrorist because he actively and vociferously promoted and agitated, argued and struggled for Black rights and liberation. Many others did that and were never labelled terrorists. Those that actively supported or promoted the military campaign were. Important difference.
 
Arthur said:
And I understand that and can even sympathise, though I totally disagree with his anaysis of how the situation came about and what we are to do about it.

Careful now. That word "fought" is awfully loaded and equivocal.

Mandela was a called (and convicted of being) a terrorist because he was co-founder and leader in a military organisation (uMkhonto we Sizwe) that actively worked to overthrow the South Africa state by force of arms, which included attacks on public places with civilians.

He was not called a terrorist because he actively and vociferously promoted and agitated, argued and struggled for Black rights and liberation. Many others did that and were never labelled terrorists. Those that actively supported or promoted the military campaign were. Important difference.
Click to expand...
History. It should be a requirement before we allow people to vote.
 
Jola said:
Well, the US Government also classified him as a terrorist.
Click to expand...
Well, i wouldn't care what the biggest terrorist state on earth calls me.

Besides, you're talking about a goverment that classifies state sanctioned torture as enhanced interrogation
 
JustAsk said:
...by a illegitimate goverment, which make anything they did, fruit from a poisonous tree.
Click to expand...
And what makes a government legitimate? Consent of the governed? You'd better apply that principle to China and the absolute monarchies in the Middle East, as well as the USSR and all the former communist states in Eastern Europe. And all traditional Black societies which were monarchies. Do you?
 
Last edited:
JustAsk said:
Well, i wouldn't care what the biggest terrorist state on earth calls me.

Besides, you're talking about a goverment that classifies state sanctioned torture as enhanced interrogation
Click to expand...

That will bomb you to extinction if only it mean they get their hands on oil. The irony is that more people died unnecessarily because of Bush but Mandela is the terrorist.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X