Apple, while not that great have been ahead of the rest.
Which brings me to an interesting question......How does the samsung Note's battery life compare to the Iphone4's...?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Apple, while not that great have been ahead of the rest.
Which brings me to an interesting question......How does the samsung Note's battery life compare to the Iphone4's...?
The phone has the latest firmware installed, I think that manufactures have forgotten about Ohms Law - The law stating that the direct current flowing in a conductor is directly proportional to the potential difference between its ends. It is usually formulated as V = IR, where V is the potential difference, or voltage, I is the current, and R is the resistance of the conductor - and simply that, accordingly if Nokia or any other manufacter of smartphones do not correct this power problem then the phone model is a "Lemon" as the yanks say.
Yep, it's sad but even worse when you realize that one of the worlds top battery researchers is a South African for whom, post 1994, could not apparently find a post in RSA and now heads up R&D at the top USA battery research facility:
http://www.anl.gov/Science_and_Technology/Distinguished_Fellows/thackeray.html
The thing that takes away battery life is when you enable packet data. Turn that off and I guarantee your battery will last for days. Only turn it on when you need it and rather use Wifi if you can.
By controlling both the hardware and software, Apple are able to better manage the power consumption of their batteries - precisely the reason I chose the iPhone 4 over the various Android phones. And if that's not enough for the super user, options like the Mophie case (www.mophie.com) are available.
We need Plutonium batteries.
Man I hope they make a GSM version of the RAZR MAXX. It is the RAZR but a bit thicker and with a massive 3300mAH battery
It's not just all about the battery! Battery tech has improved drastically over the past few years. I still remember having to carefully discharge the early Nokias which had NiCad. Then NiMH became mainstream and phones would last for days on end.
Now try and imagine what did those batteries back then have to power? A tiny black and white LCD, no GPRS, no MP3 player. My first colour phone was a Nokia 3510 and it's battery lasted only a day (as a result of heavy snake II playing, in COLOUR! Lol).
Now step forwards ~10 years and what do the latest LiPO/Li-ion batteries have to power? Massive 3-inch + Hi-Res brightly backlit screens, HSDPA, 1 Ghz + CPUs, 3D GPUs, WiFi, Bluetooth, video playback, music playback.... You get the picture!! So no, a comparison back to days of old is not substantiated.
Cellphone technology has just moved too fast for battery tech! Like it has been mentioned in this thread, phones like the iPhone last quite a bit longer than most other brands and I think this is purely because of well engineered circuitry.
The writer does not disclose which smartphone he uses, albeit he does mention his first smart phone. My guess would be that he is using an iPhone because he refers to the battery indicator turning red. What do you think?
The writer does not disclose which smartphone he uses, albeit he does mention his first smart phone. My guess would be that he is using an iPhone because he refers to the battery indicator turning red. What do you think?
You just need to drop down to GSM (GPRS/Edge) instead of 3G. It is the 3G that does most of the battery chomping.
On Edge, I get through the whole day with moderate use and home in the evening with battery between 65 and 70%.
I cant honesty believe that one mans bitch about the battery life of his phone constitutes a quality frontpage article on my broadband.