Not aware of that, but likely that CAA will take it under review.I was under the impression that their own report recommended that CAA appoint an independent body to investigate the accident further.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Not aware of that, but likely that CAA will take it under review.I was under the impression that their own report recommended that CAA appoint an independent body to investigate the accident further.
I think Ethiopian authorities did the investigation and report; SACAA trying to get them to change some of it.I was under the impression that their own report recommended that CAA appoint an independent body to investigate the accident further.
They are hired by the CAA as far as I know and they are paid quite handsomely... The fact that you hardly ever heard any negative reportage about them means they are doing quite a satisfactory job.Out of interest what about the people who run the airport's themselves the control towers and and equipment to ensure flights take off and land safely, who runs that in South Africa and how well run are they?
Are ATC not employed by ATNS?They are hired by the CAA as far as I know and they are paid quite handsomely... The fact that you hardly ever heard any negative reportage about them means they are doing quite a satisfactory job.
Since this is about Comair, one of the findings from Kulula's loss of separation incident in February:Out of interest what about the people who run the airport's themselves the control towers and and equipment to ensure flights take off and land safely, who runs that in South Africa and how well run are they?
The reduced separation which resulted in RA was caused by ATC clearing ZS-ZWF for right visual approach RWY 07 before instructing ZS-ASN to break off final approach and reposition to left downwind. This resulted in a much faster aircraft (ZS-ZWF) being behind a slower aircraft (ZS-ASN), as well as being 500 feet apart.
What does that all mean, who was at fault for the incident?Since this is about Comair, one of the findings from Kulula's loss of separation incident in February:
Some airlines handle their own maintenanceDon't SAA Technical run the maintenance at all SA airports?
Bad news for BA, usually they're a very good airline, at the end of the day, if they close their doors it only disadvantages the SA consumer againSome airlines handle their own maintenance
lol the bribes got paidAnd magically all of a sudden, the paperwork is sorted, and the suspension is lifted:
![]()
Comair suspension lifted, kulula.com and BA flights can resume | Business
British Airways (operated by Comair) and kulula.com flights will start operating again on Thursday morning, 17 March, following the South African Civil Aviation Authority reinstating the company's Air Operators’ Certificate.www.news24.com
Or their paperwork is in order.lol the bribes got paid![]()
Or their paperwork is in order.![]()
I'd like to understand what you were expecting? If they were not in compliance and then completed handing in the proof of compliance, do you expect the suspension to be lifted slowly? Maybe lift a percentage of the suspension every day until they are 100% unsuspended?And magically all of a sudden, the paperwork is sorted, and the suspension is lifted:
![]()
Comair suspension lifted, kulula.com and BA flights can resume | Business
British Airways (operated by Comair) and kulula.com flights will start operating again on Thursday morning, 17 March, following the South African Civil Aviation Authority reinstating the company's Air Operators’ Certificate.www.news24.com
I'd like to understand what you were expecting? If they were not in compliance and then completed handing in the proof of compliance, do you expect the suspension to be lifted slowly? Maybe lift a percentage of the suspension every day until they are 100% unsuspended?
It's a binary situation in my understanding. Not meeting compliance = suspension. Once proof of compliance is verified -> unsuspended.
If you read my previous post, IMO this whole process was subjective. There was no evidence of safety violations, other than random engine failures, and some incomplete paperwork. Abruptly shutting down an airline for this seems grossly disproportionate.
You are aware of the papertrail that the airlines have to follow to maintain their licenses ?
There was another article that they changed maintenance vendors.
Reading between the lines that after those violations the paperwork was found to be wanting, so therefor they got shutdown.
With all the crap happening at SAA Technical I am not surprised. SAA Technical lost a lot of the senior guys that held multiple certfication's for various airframes.