Compulsory e-tag - or lose your drivers licence

I don't see how the article gets from this:

If instituted, it would give "peace officers" the power to stop cars and demand to see a driver's licence and to produce any other tag or document they were required to have.

to this:

The SA National Roads Association Limited (Sanral) is attempting to legally force motorists to buy an e-tag or have their driver's licences taken away, according to a report on Tuesday.
 
Much as this is misinformation atm... its the word "tag" that is worrying.

Its kind of like SANRAL will try get this passed while an e-tag is not compulsory to drive on the roads and then in a year or twos time make it compulsory to have a tag to use the toll roads.
 
Misinformation, constitutional, unconstitutional, "peace officers"...
Doesn't matter.

If reading stuff like this on a day where the fuel price spikes with 71 cents doesn't send you into a blind rage, then your soul truly is dead.
 
Last edited:
Great april fool's joke, it's only laughable even if not...
 
If reading stuff like this on a day where the fuel price spikes with 71 cents doesn't send you into a blind rage, then your soul truly is dead.

If I lived on the reef it would, but then I probably would've sold my soul to move away way before that.
 
Much as this is misinformation atm... its the word "tag" that is worrying.

Its kind of like SANRAL will try get this passed while an e-tag is not compulsory to drive on the roads and then in a year or twos time make it compulsory to have a tag to use the toll roads.

Exactly my problem, the word tag makes me feel like these clowns will be able to monitor your car at any time.. how do we know what is inside this tag? can they see where our cars are at all times? do we believe there claims if they say they cannot? I can just see cars getting stolen from insiders like they do with the tracking systems. Or maybe im just a bit paranoid.
 
What a load of **** country we live in. These greedy ****s just do as they please. **** you ****s!!! I will not buy your stupid e-tag and I will not pay a cent!! We really need to burn these damn things to the ground!!
 
What a load of **** country we live in. These greedy ****s just do as they please. **** you ****s!!! I will not buy your stupid e-tag and I will not pay a cent!! We really need to burn these damn things to the ground!!

Your reponse is a little on the soft side. But yes, I absolutely agree :D
 
Why don't you all just find out what the Minister of transports number plate it, get some duplicates made and hand them out to everyone. Lets see how he like's it when he has to prove that 1000s of bills arent his.

then we still pay for it.
 
Why don't you all just find out what the Minister of transports number plate it, get some duplicates made and hand them out to everyone. Lets see how he like's it when he has to prove that 1000s of bills arent his.

Won't work. Our ministers e-tags are paid for by - us - via our tax monies. They don't pay their own transport costs. They wouldn't even notice.
 
Draft South African National Roads Agency Limited and National Roads Act Regulations, 2012: South African National Roads Agency Limited and National Roads Act 7 of 1998. For comment to [email protected] by 16 April 2012. (GG 35182, GN 252, 2012-03-27 - access for Government Gazette subscribers, or purchase this document)

Voice comments to [email protected] ,
 
If instituted, it would give "peace officers" the power to stop cars and demand to see a driver's licence and to produce any other tag or document they were required to have.

The could have said cops, metro police - so what/who are 'peace officers' ?
 
I actually wonder, a lot of people have gotten drivers licences, but do not have cars. How are they going to distinguish between the two?
 
There are numerous reasons as to why this is unconstitutional. One of which is the AARTO vs Criminal Act bit. Local residents will be prosecuted under AARTO while non-locals will be prosecuted under the criminal act. These two punishments are vastly different from each other which affords citizens from certain areas more/less rights than others. It is absolutely unconstitutional from every single aspect you look at it...
 
There are numerous reasons as to why this is unconstitutional. One of which is the AARTO vs Criminal Act bit. Local residents will be prosecuted under AARTO while non-locals will be prosecuted under the criminal act. These two punishments are vastly different from each other which affords citizens from certain areas more/less rights than others. It is absolutely unconstitutional from every single aspect you look at it...

so how did they manage to build it before realizing that it will be unconstitutional and probably illegal?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X