South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Hasnt that always been the case?Committee members also criticised power given to Communications Minister Ivy Matsepe-Casaburri to authorise landing rights of the undersea cable and revoke them, as she would be both “referee and player”.
However, communications department senior manager of policy Mashila Matlala said the intention of the guidelines was to ensure Matsepe-Casaburri was kept informed on the shareholding and ownership structures of undersea cable companies, as this could have national security implications for SA.
This is just the worst kind of journalism. There is no deadline related to the world cup, the world cup doesn't need DTT - this is sensationalist journalism and irritating - I wish they'd stick to the point at hand: The DoC is inefficient and patently incompetent, you don't need to add anything to the story.Concern is mounting that SA might miss the deadline to have a fully functioning digital broadcasting system in time for the Soccer World Cup.
Yes there's concern, yes there's poor planning (at the DoC, really?!), but wtf does this have to do with the world cup?
This is just the worst kind of journalism. There is no deadline related to the world cup, the world cup doesn't need DTT - this is sensationalist journalism and irritating - I wish they'd stick to the point at hand: The DoC is inefficient and patently incompetent, you don't need to add anything to the story.
Yes there's concern, yes there's poor planning (at the DoC, really?!), but wtf does this have to do with the world cup?
This is just the worst kind of journalism. There is no deadline related to the world cup, the world cup doesn't need DTT - this is sensationalist journalism and irritating - I wish they'd stick to the point at hand: The DoC is inefficient and patently incompetent, you don't need to add anything to the story.
I agree, but they were never going to be able to from day one. Every country that has followed this path has had to extend their deadlines and most of them were not as ambitious as SA. Given the ineptitude at the DoC and the underresourcing of Sentech to do the project, failure was always the only option.It's a self-imposed deadline. They said a while ago that they wanted to switch off analog by whenever-it-is, and now it's looking like they won't be able to do it.
Obvious to whom? Evidently to the journalist but not to me. The deadline for analogue switch-off is 2011, no need to mention the world cup.The other deadline is that they obviously want to broadcast the world cup digitally - which they can do without switching over completely, but it sounds like they're struggling to get the infrastructure in place even for that.
This is the real reason for the delay... who is going to pay the R500 for the stb?I know it has to be done eventually, and the rest of the world is doing it, but how many people are out there with ancient tv's, who will now have to buy a set-top box just to keep watching the 'free' channels? From people in shacks to people in old age homes to just ordinary people who don't feel the need to upgrade to the latest and greatest and biggest tv every year or so.
This is the real reason for the delay... who is going to pay the R500 for the stb?