Coup/protest in the US

NarrowBandFtw said:
"present the facts" meaning just the information, not the narrative

for example:
- mass voter fraud has been alleged by <xyz> in <abc>

that is presenting the facts, what I do not waste time on is:
- Trumpenfuhrer grasps at straws looking for fraud that never happened

there's a vast difference in the two styles of reporting, and gullible sheep tend to flock to the editorialised style
Click to expand...
Where are your *facts* about seven million cases of voter fraud, pal?

The facts.

Only the facts.
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
where did I make that claim?

only the facts, what were my actual words?
Click to expand...

You are correct, Narrow... Cray said seven million. You raised the stakes to 80 million
NarrowBandFtw said:
you mean "80 million"?

impossible to say seeing as courts refused to hear the evidence for the most part, the "no evidence of fraud" line should be ridiculed however:
www.texasattorneygeneral.gov

AG Paxton: San Antonio Election Fraudster Arrested for Widespread Vote Harvesting and Fraud

www.texasattorneygeneral.gov www.texasattorneygeneral.gov

given the sheer size of the voting numbers it is fair to say that even if the fraud was "within norms" for a US election, the number would be bigger than usual

what I'm most interested to know is whether the fraud in this election favoured one candidate more than it usually does
Click to expand...

NarrowBandFtw said:
one specific case ... now multiply that by how many people were doing it, or doing even worse things, in how many states?

I'd like to know who was favoured by the fraud overall, which is currently impossible to know, I have my suspicions and others will have theirs.
Click to expand...

The rest was your opinion, suspicion or, you know... "narrative".

Anyway, I can't help notice you still haven't interrupted my list of publications, other than deflecting from my question... So I'll just be here sipping my tasty beverage 'till you do.

d96f3c7d61f3f7ce01f703b7b8bafac9.gif
 
greg0205 said:
You are correct, Narrow... Cray said seven million. You raised the stakes to 80 million
Click to expand...
Jesus, quote me a post where I said 7 / 80 or ANY SPECIFIC number is fraudulent?

Cray asked how many of the 7 million I estimate were fraudulent, I clarified with a question, 80 million is Biden's total tally, the question would be how many of his (and Trump's) total tally were fraudulent.

Those are the facts, though you seem deathly allergic to them.
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
Jesus, quote me a post where I said 7 / 80 or ANY SPECIFIC number is fraudulent?

Cray asked how many of the 7 million I estimate were fraudulent, I clarified with a question, 80 million is Biden's total tally, the question would be how many of his (and Trump's) total tally were fraudulent.

Those are the facts, though you seem deathly allergic to them.
Click to expand...
You say you're curious, but I was the one who actually went looking and *literally* posted about all of the PA election fraud cases.

Your curiosity and effort to find and report on any election fraud from Biden voters remains at a deeply unimpressive... zero posts.
 
greg0205 said:
You say you're curious, but I was the one who actually went looking and *literally* posted about all of the PA election fraud cases.

Your curiosity and effort to find and report on any election fraud from Biden voters remains at a deeply unimpressive... zero posts.
Click to expand...
poor attempt at deflection, answer the question
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
poor attempt at deflection, answer the question
Click to expand...
Periodic reminder:

Anyway, I can't help notice you still haven't interrupted my list of publications, other than deflecting from my question... So I'll just be here sipping my tasty beverage 'till you do.

d96f3c7d61f3f7ce01f703b7b8bafac9.gif
Click to expand...

But tell me more about deflection.

PS:
the question would be how many of his (and Trump's) total tally were fraudulent.
Click to expand...

How many of the *155 million* votes cast were fraudulent?

The three in PA, and they were all for Donnie.
 
greg0205 said:
Periodic reminder:



But tell me more about deflection.

PS:


How many of the *155 million* votes cast were fraudulent?

The three in PA, and they were all for Donnie.
Click to expand...
are you a child?

you provide a list of publications that range from typical MSM to fringe radical left and issue some childish challenge, I have no interest in playing your bullshyte game fyi, I'm an adult after all

you however also misrepresent my words, asking you for an actual quote to substantiate your claim is quite reasonable (as opposed to asking you to play a game of hopscotch with one hand tied while singing xmas songs ... aka your silly irrational "stop me while I traverse my list no-one cares about" game)
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
you provide a list of publications that range from typical MSM to fringe radical left
Click to expand...

YAWWWN. It's over dude. All the cretins have fled the morass. There isn't anyone here to have a love in with over this nonsense.

Gingerbreadman? poof!
Xarog? poof!
CaptainOblivious poof!
( I know they are all the same person, that's the joke.)
...even Em seems to be using a sockpuppet now.

2021 cray you guys....
 
The more successful coup was the one having taken 245 years.

The goal: to undo/reverse the effect of the American secession i.e. the transfer of sovereignty to individuals.

Are there any Biden supporters who support the principle of secession?
 
daveza said:
www.foxnews.com

Capitol rioter accused of stealing Nancy Pelosi's laptop turns herself in: authorities

A Capitol rioter accused of taking a laptop from Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s office during the Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol siege with the alleged intention of selling the device to Russian intelligence forces has turned herself in on Monday, according to authorities.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

Fark me but these people are dumb.

Planned to sell information from the Capitol to the Russians ?
Click to expand...

Yep. Coals to Newcastle and all that...
 
greg0205 said:
I'll just start naming Donnie critics... Stop me if I get to one you haven't had a go at in the last four years.

The Lincoln Project
CNN
MSNBC
the NYT
WaPo
WSJ
Bloomberg
Axios
The Atlantic
The Daily Beast
The Hill
NPR
Reason
Slate
Mother Jones
The AP
The Intercept
The New Yorker
Vox
Politifact
BuzzFeed
MediaBiasFactCheck
Wikipedia
The Daily Show
Colbert
Meyers
Last Week Tonight

More...?
Click to expand...

You forgot the MyBB echo chamber thread
 
thestaggy said:
Seems to be a thing in the US. I've seen it in many Reddit subs with people saying they are not speaking to relatives because they support(ed) Trump.

Politics have become people's entire personalities and reason to exist.
Click to expand...

Same thing with brexit - I know families who've split (grown kids from parents) over that issue.
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
for example:
- mass voter fraud has been alleged by <xyz> in <abc>
Click to expand...

you know the "fact" in that example is a data point, right? "an allegation was made". as a data point, it carries the same weight as every time you've made that allegation here.

edit for clarity:

1. data points about allegations aren't evidence of the truth of the allegations.

2. to get the allegations investigated, the people making the allegations have to bring evidence other than the allegation. (kind of like what's repeatedly been asked for in this thread, just on a larger and more formal scale.)

3. if they can't, then the allegations are dismissed. (kind of like what repeatedly keeps happening in this thread, just on a larger and more formal scale.)
 
Last edited:
daelm said:
you know the fact in that example is a data point, right? "an allegation was made". as a data point, it carries the same weight as every time you've made that allegation here.
Click to expand...
you know as a reader I'm more than happy to just be informed an allegation was made and then take a look and reach my own conclusion right?

as opposed to being told what the only conclusion is that I'm allowed to reach

take any random sample from MSM articles and you will only find the latter
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
you know as a reader I'm more than happy to just be informed an allegation was made and then take a look and reach my own conclusion right?

as opposed to being told what the only conclusion is that I'm allowed to reach

take any random sample from MSM articles and you will only find the latter
Click to expand...

i edited for clarity. how you doin', buddy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X