Cricket: International Discussion Thread

[cavedog]

Meh Sri Lanka's batting is disappointing

 

[cavedog]

Tomorrow. Should be good.

 

[Ecco]

Tomorrow. Should be good.

View attachment 1930615

You never know with Pakistan

 

[Luke7777]

You never know with Pakistan

or England

 

[cavedog]

Wicket on the first ball... Might be a 2 day test match if this continues.

 

[dabbler]

Pakistan 7-2
Edit 11-2

 

[cavedog]

Covers on. As expected in England...

 

[cavedog]

England rolled Pakistan for an innings and 103 runs...

 

[iToldYouSo]

England rolled Pakistan for an innings and 103 runs...

Australia is about to do the same Bangladesh.

 

[Ecco]

Australia is about to do the same Bangladesh.

Starc inflicting the most damage. Took 5 wickets.

Bangladesh on 55/9

 

[Agent_Smith]

I expected Australia would come back determined to put on a better display but wasn't expecting this.

 

[akescpt]

Nothing will erase the fact that they lost to Bangladesh. Sies. This mighty cricket team.

 

[Ecco]

Starc displaces Steyn to make the top 10 test wicket takers list.

 

[Ecco]

Aus top 3 out already.

 

[cavedog]

Australia also struggling. Pitch must be a minefield

 

[Ecco]

Game almost over. Tea break.

Bangladesh 51 short of Aus 210. But only 2 wickets in hand.

Starc delivers the goods again


Fewest balls to take ten wickets in a men's Test match:

91 - George Lohmann vs SA, Johannesburg, 1896

98 - Johnny Briggs vs SA, Cape Town, 1889

103 - George Lohmann vs SA, Gqeberha, 1896

104 - Frank Woolley vs AUS, The Oval, 1912

109 - Mitchell Starc vs BAN, Mackay, 2026

 

[stefan9]

Aus won by an innings. More to do with the bowlers , batting was woeful again.

 

[stefan9]

More English boys behaving badly:

 

[stefan9]

Lol guess who is hiding behind a pillar while carse is getting cuffed by the cops.

 

[Sideshow Bob]

Nothing will erase the fact that they lost to Bangladesh. Sies. This mighty cricket team.

Indeed. Maybe they should stop playing cricket in you opinion ? Or hang their heads in shame for 100 years ?