Cricket world cup discussion thread

Ah so you had to wait until Pakitan managed to scrape a win before posting here.

Sorry, but the real losers are ones who can be bowled out Canada with 7 overs to spare.

If i am not mistaken 50 over cricket is a 50 over game but it does mean 50 overs will be completed and they did win the game. So i am not sure what your point is. They won the game be it in 50 overs or 35 overs. The real losers are the ones who actually lost surely?

Maybe my understanding of losing a match and being called a loser is wrong when you win a match you get called a loser? Odd logic but each to their own. Losers are england for sure cause well they ummm lost but they made it to 50 overs at least. So losing in 50 overs must be better than winning in 43 hey?

Explain further this losers logic for me please.
 
afridi is a dam freak.

129384.2.jpg


There is nothing in the world of cricket that gets changing channels than this :mad: :twisted:
 
[Quattro];5683225 said:
[-]Why are losers supporting Canada lol...

Anyway umpires decisions have been shocking in this game, why should a close call minus a review? Rather silly, all of Pakis reviews were out!!!
Good day for the slumos, Tahir, Amla and Pakis[/-]

There, I feel better already ;)
 
Damn minnows, can't even trust them to chase 184 :(

Yeah, [-]I was a wee bit[/-] *try again* I was extremely disappointed that the Canadians couldn't have wreaked an upset here. Such is life. :(
 
The surfer and the sage

A feel-good story...

This is taken from here, for me it's perfect combination :)

------>

Imagine if you could tell a man's batting style by the way he looked. Jacques Kallis would be dopey, Stuart Broad would be delicate and Charles Coventry would be a nudger and nurdler. Not so, of course. But in some cases it does apply. Yusuf Pathan is destructive, Younis Khan is thoughtful and Shane Watson is flashy.

It also worked for Hashim Amla and AB de Villiers in their respective innings against the Netherlands. Amla, with his sagely beard and neatly perched glasses, was a patient planner while de Villiers, with his surfer blonde hair and cheeky smile, was fun-loving, mischievous and carefree. Together they put on the highest third-wicket partnership Mohali has seen in one-dayers, and although the statistic is a feat in itself, it was the way they went about crafting their respective innings that made each one so special.

Amla had to do the harder work. Conditions were tricky upfront, with moisture hanging in the air, a chilly breeze whipping through the ground and a patchy, two-paced wicket. He started off playing the game we've come to call his natural one, hitting flourishing fours on the off side and one luxurious pull to fine leg. While he was initially connecting well, he soon started edging more than he was middling and with Graeme Smith poking about awkwardly at the other end, he had no choice but to retreat and regroup.

Mudassar Bukhari was a different bowler to the one who had been so mercilessly torn into by West Indies and as he found better lines and lengths, the batsmen had to find better ways of seeing him off. He almost had Amla twice in the first ten overs, once when a bottom edge fell just in front of wicketkeeper Wesley Barresi and then when he reviewed an lbw shout only to prove the umpire's not-out verdict right.

As the sun came out, batting became easier and Amla started to settle. He still wasn't able to drive with great confidence and had to work the ball around, concentrating on his pushes. Jacques Kallis was under the same strain, driving away from the body, more like he was at the wheel of a rusty old Volkswagen Beetle that just did not want to get started than the seat of a sleek German sedan. When he nicked one down the leg side, three balls after the first two Powerplays were completed, de Villiers arrived at the crease with fresh eyes.

"I had to stick to my game plan more than usual because of the conditions. I wasn't actually that positive but I knew I had to focus on the basics more than normal," de Villiers said. His basics, when it comes to batting, include rotating the strike. Although he was able to sink his teeth into two wayward Ryan ten Doeschate deliveries, the bulk of his early time at the wicket was spent knocking the ball around.

For eight overs and four balls, de Villiers and Amla scrambled. As the ball got older and the conditions became more batsman friendly, the scramble became simpler. The gaps were there for puncturing, and the singles were offering themselves like water to a thirsty man. The flow tired Netherlands' bowlers and then the boundary balls started coming, almost one an over. When the bowlers tightened, de Villiers and Amla were back to small-steps mode. Push, run, dab it down, run two, nudge, run again, flick away, run two.

Between them, they scored 108 singles and 22 runs in twos. They got into a rhythm and it frustrated the opposition, while adding, little by little, to the nest they were building. "AB and Hashim played magnificently," Smith said. "We knew that we had to set up a base and once we did that we could attack."

The attack came in the batting Powerplay, as it rightly should, but hasn't always in this World Cup. It's been a five-over period where the batsmen have gone for shots they would otherwise keep for garden cricket with their mates and, in so doing, have fallen. Amla and de Villiers did otherwise. The former hung back a little, indicative of his whole innings, while the latter launched. He hit the first six of the innings in the 42nd over and then smashed three more.

It was unexpected for such flair to come from a man who had struggled in the nets in Delhi. "I didn't get a good net there, I think the practice facilities were quite tough," de Villiers said. Bad net, good knock it seems as he was seeing the ball like a balloon. "I think we paced it well and I felt I had the freedom to express myself."

Both de Villiers and Amla were dismissed in the Powerplay, but they added 69 runs and theirs were the only two wickets to fall. It set JP Duminy up for the cameo of his career, an audacious 40 off 15 balls. "If I could have played some of the shots JP played, I would have retired today," Smith joked. Duminy: there's another one who doesn't look like he bats - timid, meek and mild. Not at all.
 
If i am not mistaken 50 over cricket is a 50 over game but it does mean 50 overs will be completed and they did win the game. So i am not sure what your point is. They won the game be it in 50 overs or 35 overs. The real losers are the ones who actually lost surely?

Maybe my understanding of losing a match and being called a loser is wrong when you win a match you get called a loser? Odd logic but each to their own. Losers are england for sure cause well they ummm lost but they made it to 50 overs at least. So losing in 50 overs must be better than winning in 43 hey?

Explain further this losers logic for me please.

Um, he obviously didn't mean losers in the sense of who lost the game. In the same way I'm not referring to the Pakis in terms of the match result. The word is not restricted to one specific meaning.

Here's a bit of help for you: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/loser
 
Ah so you had to wait until Pakitan managed to scrape a win before posting here.

Sorry, but the real losers are ones who can be bowled out Canada with 7 overs to spare.

Well my FB status at 2pm was 'The Pakis have the best bowling attack in the WC, they will win' and they did. wasn't worried, not one bit.
 
[Quattro];5683907 said:
Well my FB status at 2pm was 'The Pakis have the best bowling attack in the WC, they will win' and they did. wasn't worried, not one bit.

We are all free to believe what we want :wtf:
 
Interesting piece of info - AB's last four ODIs in India:
114*
102*
107*
134

Somehow while everyone was talking about Amla's form, AB went unnoticed :) Hope it stays that way if this is how he's going to perform.
 
Interesting piece of info - AB's last four ODIs in India:
114*
102*
107*
134

Somehow while everyone was talking about Amla's form, AB went unnoticed :) Hope it stays that way if this is how he's going to perform.

He's on fire! Long may his form last! :)
 
AB is a flat track bully just like Sewhag... Hahahaha


He has a real chance to top the scoring charts, certainly a fan favourite. He even knows how to dance to the Bhangra ;)
 
I find JP's form of late to be more interesting, and I am loving the new-found aggression he has. Watch out for him this WC - he owes big time!
 
Zim struggling against the Black Caps, now 46/4 in the 15th over :(
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X