Cuts to the point doesn't it?‏

Except for the US soldier, they are mentioned because they were all neo-colonial British possessions (or owed allegiance to Britain). It can be argued that the US was also neo-colonial, but that was way back when. They all were on the same page anyway. Russia had its own agenda.

From her POV these people fought for HER freedom. Depending on who you were, different people fought for you. At some stage in history different people - yours and foreign - may have fought for you.
 
Well, I agreed with the tone, just not the Jesus Christ and holy bible bit.

aTrueASl, who then? They are muslims. Don't sit there and tell me they're not because REAL muslims wouldn't do that. The men who did that were muslims

A person really needs to explain things in depth with you, hey? I didn't mean it that REAL Muslims wouldn't do it. Regardless of a good Muslim, terrorist Muslim, etc... no Muslims were involved. It was all USA and her friend.

Be careful of propaganda.
 
A person really needs to explain things in depth with you, hey? I didn't mean it that REAL Muslims wouldn't do it. Regardless of a good Muslim, terrorist Muslim, etc... no Muslims were involved. It was all USA and her friend.

Be careful of propaganda.

In order of importance:

:wtf::wtf::sick::wtf:
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X