Debates - Potential Faulty Science

I have proved some of your "facts" are wrong: this is a real scientific debate - not a rehearsal of textbooks.
 
talanum1 said:
I have proved some of your "facts" are wrong: this is a real scientific debate - not a rehearsal of textbooks.
Click to expand...

My facts? :unsure:

But nope. Not really that I've seen, maybe you've shown a bit of the unstable side of science, I wouldn't know enough to say.
Or show us where...

Anyway - doesn't mean you need 50 threads
 
talanum1 said:
OK. I'll put all under the same title in future.
Click to expand...

If you click on the "Report" button you can ask the Moderator to change the title of this one.

May I suggest something like: "Debates - potentially faulty science"


Thanks for the chat
 
Complex numbers are justified by setting i = sqrt(-1). Bringing in j and k is therefore not justified.
 
Mathematical rules ALWAYS applies, to all formulas if it's part of Mathematics. Stating you cannot draw the square root on both sides of an equation makes the equation OUTSIDE of Mathematics.
 
talanum1 said:
Mathematical rules ALWAYS applies, to all formulas if it's part of Mathematics. Stating you cannot draw the square root on both sides of an equation makes the equation OUTSIDE of Mathematics.
Click to expand...

Likely a misunderstanding (again). Think about it; there's millions of interested scientists and science-followers, but only you could pick this up??

Not likely....
 
Brian_G said:
but only you could pick this up
Click to expand...
They took it at face value and didn't try to substitute sqrt(-1) for i, j, k. By definition: it is they that are misunderstanding. Computer scientist have been happily working with what they thought was Mathematics, but is now proven to be outside of it.
 
Brian_G said:
Likely a misunderstanding (again). Think about it; there's millions of interested scientists and science-followers, but only you could pick this up??

Not likely....
Click to expand...
Don't be dense you idiot , they don't know about the sqrt. Moron!

/How can we debate something officially without insult :ROFL:

Edit: at least the insults we understand
 
talanum1 said:
They took it at face value and didn't try to substitute sqrt(-1) for i, j, k. By definition: it is they that are misunderstanding. Computer scientist have been happily working with what they thought was Mathematics, but is now proven to be outside of it.
Click to expand...

Wow. They all missed the mistake, only you can find it.


Remember - you've claimed this kind of "mistake" before within other threads, many, many times, and have always been shown you were wrong.

Maybe time to recognise the fault is somewhere in..... you.
 
Brian_G said:
Wow. They all missed the mistake, only you can find it.


Remember - you've claimed this kind of "mistake" before with other threads, many, many times, and have always been shown you were wrong.

Maybe time to recognise the fault is somewhere in..... you.
Click to expand...
AI is wrong most of the time with stuff like this. Best is to look at Academic Articles
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X