Debian Squeeze

When I copy things, I just use Nautilus. I hate software like f-spot (which I assume is what you're referring to), as I can't get to the file system. Most music players also do this. geeqie, which I mentioned earlier in this thread, is a nice really quick viewer as it loads the embedded jpeg not the whole RAW file. As far as geotagging goes have you looked at this?

http://code.google.com/p/gpicsync/

I'm not into geotagging, so I can't help further.
 
When I copy things, I just use Nautilus. I hate software like f-spot (which I assume is what you're referring to), as I can't get to the file system. Most music players also do this.

I understand your reluctance, I resisted this since the first image I loaded off a 5.25" floppy disc onto an amber screen, but in the end it's futile. Aperture allows you to maintain your own directory/file structure, or to let it manage it for you. So it doesn't take away your access to the files. That was the way I used it at first but I realised later I'm not gaining anything from it, and these days I just let it handle the files. I can still find them if I need them. The main reason I use Aperture is for the organisational features. In particular, I like the following:

1. Organising images by projects and albums and folders. And I can mix these three and nest them whichever way I please.
2. Smart albums. This allows me to group certain images into an album based on whatever criteria I define: keywords, size, lens used, apterture/shutter/whatever, how I rated the image, when it was taken, etc. Pretty much anything that can exist in the metadata, can be used. This is incredibly powerful.
3. hierarchical keywording
4. I can add informtation to an image without altering the original file.

There are many more, but suffice to say, it's an incredibly powerful organisational tool. The files are still on my hard drive, and if I want to move to a different app, I can simply take the lot or I can export them into whatever structure you wish.

geeqie, which I mentioned earlier in this thread, is a nice really quick viewer as it loads the embedded jpeg not the whole RAW file. As far as geotagging goes have you looked at this?

http://code.google.com/p/gpicsync/

Nope, I'll check it out. Thanks! The biggest issue I've had with most of the ones I've tried is that they either don't normalise or they're very bad at it. The one I ended up keeping is GpsPhotoLinker and later their paid version.

I'm not into geotagging, so I can't help further.

I'm bigtime into it. I realised that it's an excellent idea when I was developing 15 year old films and discovered I have no idea where most of the pictures were taken. Same reason I keyword. I have pictures of me and other people, and some don't even look familiar - no idea who they were, but they were clearly important enough for me to want my picture taken with them!
 
I'm bigtime into it. I realised that it's an excellent idea when I was developing 15 year old films and discovered I have no idea where most of the pictures were taken. Same reason I keyword. I have pictures of me and other people, and some don't even look familiar - no idea who they were, but they were clearly important enough for me to want my picture taken with them!

Actually, it's more than this. When my grandma passed away, I inherited a shoebox full of photos that basically span her life up to the point where her children started owning their own cameras. Aside from the obvious aunts and uncles who appear as children or young adults, I have no idea who any of the people in those pictures are, and neither do anyone (alive) in the family. What I do know is that, among that pile are pictures of my many of my ancestors and I can't even identify them.

When I pass away, I want my photo collection to be a well documented account of my life, not a mystery my family will never be able to solve.
 
For those who are unhappy with the default fonts, appearance, etc. in Squeeze I found the following which makes a massive improvement

This is more an answer to “it looks ugly in KDE”. Maybe you need to “tune” it bit. Do you have these packages installed?

gtk-qt-engine gtk2-engines-qtcurve kde-config-gtk-style kwin-style-qtcurve qtcurve

Afterwards go to KDE’s system settings –> Appearance –> GTK+ Appearance and play around with the settings.
 
For those who are unhappy with the default fonts...

The default font size is something that's been driving me to distraction in Debian. To fix this, I edit the start-up line in /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc

Code:
exec /usr/bin/X [B]-dpi 100[/B] -nolisten tcp "$@"
 
Let me slip the question in here so that lot of the noise gets dissipated: 32 or 64? Got all the parts for my new box and will put it together tomorrow, so am wondering whether there's any real advantage to 64-bit before I start downloading. From what I've read, there's as many yays as nays.
 
Let me slip the question in here so that lot of the noise gets dissipated: 32 or 64? Got all the parts for my new box and will put it together tomorrow, so am wondering whether there's any real advantage to 64-bit before I start downloading. From what I've read, there's as many yays as nays.

more memory!!! Cant do much with 3gigs these days...
Thats the main advantage for 64...

Sent from my GT-I9000 using MyBroadband Android App
 
Let me slip the question in here so that lot of the noise gets dissipated: 32 or 64?

I've been running 64bit for about four years now. The biggest hassle in the beginning was flash and java plugins, but that's history. As hugo69er says: Memory. No process can use 4+ GB of memory in 32bit (it's really 2GB, in practise).
 
I've been running 64bit for about four years now. The biggest hassle in the beginning was flash and java plugins, but that's history. As hugo69er says: Memory. No process can use 4+ GB of memory in 32bit (it's really 2GB, in practise).

But, what processes really need that much RAM? My main memory hog would probably be virtualbox.
 
Let me slip the question in here so that lot of the noise gets dissipated: 32 or 64? Got all the parts for my new box and will put it together tomorrow, so am wondering whether there's any real advantage to 64-bit before I start downloading. From what I've read, there's as many yays as nays.
in this day and age there should be next to no instances that make you aware you are running 64-bit other than package installation.

been running 64-bit across various distros for well over 5 years now.
 
Thanks guys. I'll prolly do a dual boot machine with Ubuntu 10.04 (32) until it dies, as I have a lot of binaries and Debian Wheezy (64). I can then test other distros in a 64-bit Virtualbox, until I find one I like.
 
Really weird thing here. Ubuntu does not recognise the onboard network card on my new machine, yet wheezy's install does. Unfortunately, the wheezy net install I have is 32 bit, so I'm busy downloading the 64 bit version.

Anyone have any ideas as to what I can fiddle with to get Ubuntu to recognise the network card?
 
Check what module debian uses:

Code:
ethtool -i eth0                                                                                                                              
[B]driver: e1000e[/B]
version: 1.2.20-k2
firmware-version: 0.5-3
bus-info: 0000:00:19.0

Then on the Ubuntu installer, modprobe <driver> in a terminal and then service "network-manager restart" and you should be golden. I had to do this on my eeepc as well.
 
Check what module debian uses:

Code:
ethtool -i eth0                                                                                                                              
[B]driver: e1000e[/B]
version: 1.2.20-k2
firmware-version: 0.5-3
bus-info: 0000:00:19.0

Then on the Ubuntu installer, modprobe <driver> in a terminal and then service "network-manager restart" and you should be golden. I had to do this on my eeepc as well.

Thanks Koffie. Looks like this particular NIC (82579x) is a problem for many versions of Linux. It seems to be fixed in newer kernels, but if you want to use it with older ones, you have to compile the source and add it in via dkms. Feels to me that it may be simpler to just install another NIC (or maybe I'll just dump Ubuntu sooner than I'd planned to - the Debian Wheezy install is running just fine on that NIC). FWIW, iQunix 11.04 also recognises the NIC.
 
If age of the kernel is an issue, Ubuntu should have no problem. My Debian Squeeze has 2.6.32-5-amd64, while my Ubuntu 11.04 has 2.6.38-8-generic
 
Thanks Koffie. Looks like this particular NIC (82579x) is a problem for many versions of Linux. It seems to be fixed in newer kernels, but if you want to use it with older ones, you have to compile the source and add it in via dkms. Feels to me that it may be simpler to just install another NIC (or maybe I'll just dump Ubuntu sooner than I'd planned to - the Debian Wheezy install is running just fine on that NIC). FWIW, iQunix 11.04 also recognises the NIC.

Got the Ubuntu network stuff running by manually compiling the driver and adding it to the relevant directory (fortunately, there were enough dev tools installed from the alternate CD), then starting it with modprobe. I had to do this again when I upgraded the kernel - there must be some way to automate this with kernel upgrades. Network manager has disappeared from the panel, but I'll fight with that later.

I'm still not sure about this 64-bit stuff. Quite a pain just to get firefox working, so I will definitely be recommending 32-bit to people that I change over to Linux, regardless of their hardware.

Still can't offer opinions on the new hardware as I haven't done anything yet to test its limits. I'm busy downloading virtualbox at the moment.
 
There is a way in Debian to overlay drivers so that kernel updates (same version, minor build for backporting security fixes) don't hoze them. I'm not sure if this will work on Ubuntu, but here are the instructions I wrote for a bunch of Dell desktops we got a while back that needed a newer version of the driver than what Debian had - adapt where necessary:

Code:
Add the following to your /etc/apt/sources.list:

deb http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main non-free contrib

The following dependencies are required:

linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common
linux-kbuild-2.6.26
linux-source-2.6.26

Intel network driver:
==============

http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/e1000/e1000e-0.5.18.3.tar.gz

cd e1000e-0.5.18.3/src/

Makefile:193 replace

INSTDIR := /lib/modules/$(KVER)/kernel/drivers/net/$(DRIVER_NAME)

with

INSTDIR := /lib/modules/$(KVER)/update/kernel/drivers/net/$(DRIVER_NAME)

then:

make
make install

This will install the driver in a location that overrides what's in the kernel module tree.

If your network comes up on eth1 or something, remove the lines from /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules:

SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"

Then just reboot - should fix it.
 
There is a way in Debian to overlay drivers so that kernel updates (same version, minor build for backporting security fixes) don't hoze them. I'm not sure if this will work on Ubuntu, but here are the instructions I wrote for a bunch of Dell desktops we got a while back that needed a newer version of the driver than what Debian had - adapt where necessary:
[snip]

Thanks Koffie. Will try that 'update' directory a bit later.
 
I'm still not sure about this 64-bit stuff. Quite a pain just to get firefox working, so I will definitely be recommending 32-bit to people that I change over to Linux, regardless of their hardware.

Hey Koffie (and others) what 64-bit Firefox are you using. I've been trying to get the 32-bit version to work, but am getting "wrong ELF class" errors on several of the 32-bit libraries. FF works, but it doesn't look very pretty compared to that on 32-bit Squeeze.

[edit]FF 5 that is.[/edit]
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X