Difference between DDR2 667 and DDR2 800

The real answer is slightly more complicated - DDR II 800 can be slightly faster - but it depends on which cpu you are using - what the FSB is - as well as latency on the RAM itself... give more info
 
Basically PC's are not nearly bottlenecked with RAM these days. So performance diffrerence is barely measurable. My DDR2-667 ram scores a 5.9 (max score) in Vista.

The only thing DDR2-800 is it can overclock CPU's better than DDR2-667 (locked at 30% overclocks)
 
The price gap is so narrow it leans towards 800 - the problem used to be with 533 and some dual cores
 
Short Anser: nothing
Long Anser: Check Wikipedia

There is proabably no difference just buy more DDR2 667 not worth the money to buy all new sticks of ram :)
 
Personally I would rather spend a few extra $$$ and get the DDR2-800, I upgraded all my ram from 533 (Ok I know its slower than 667) to 4GB of DDR2-800 and I do not regret it.

As long as your PC's FSB can run at 800, get it otherwise stick with getting extra DDR2-667
 
I had 2x 667 and just bought 2x 800. They all run at 667 dual channel. I haven't really noticed any difference on XP with the extra 2GB (1.5GB). I wouldn't go to the effort of selling the 667 and buying 4x 800. Just get the best quality you can afford.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X