RiaX
Executive Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2012
- Messages
- 8,213
- Reaction score
- 4,535
I was just thinking about this topic recently. Studying the disease patterns for my research to strengthen my case and perspective I came across this idea and I would like some input if you think its ethical or not and why.
So here is the question:
Do you think it would be ethical for governments to FORCE childhood vaccinations irrelevant of religious or any other reason (apart of medical) for one to qualify from being exempt ?
Here is the case:
In today's day and age cities are populated quite densely, the more people the more disease generally. Diseases are becoming more virulent and resistant to our current treatments faster than we can provide the counter measures. With most places being multi-cultural, multi-racial and so on its unfair on society that these people that dont vaccinate pose a danger to others.
Science is often misused and misunderstood for example the whole autism thing that started the vaccine issue in the first place. The UK had completely abloished many of the childhood diseases such as rubella, DPT and polio, however these diseases are making a return not by 'natural cause' but rather human stupidity.
So a possible solution would be to have children certified as vaccinated which will allow for entry to schools and other public facilities as this will provide safety for those vaccinated also it will force adults to take their kids for vaccines. The downside will be denying the child an education if the parents are EXTREMELY stubborn. Children are dependent on their parents in making the correct decisions to protect them and are unable to make a decision themselves thus if the parents are too stupid to realise that the vaccine is important for their child's safety and are scared of hyped up adverse effects the child is left in danger. Sometimes in medicine things must be done against the will of the patient and their guardians (like committing a psychotic patient into an asylum).
So again in conclusion
Do you think its ethical for government to step in on this type of thing ?
So here is the question:
Do you think it would be ethical for governments to FORCE childhood vaccinations irrelevant of religious or any other reason (apart of medical) for one to qualify from being exempt ?
Here is the case:
In today's day and age cities are populated quite densely, the more people the more disease generally. Diseases are becoming more virulent and resistant to our current treatments faster than we can provide the counter measures. With most places being multi-cultural, multi-racial and so on its unfair on society that these people that dont vaccinate pose a danger to others.
Science is often misused and misunderstood for example the whole autism thing that started the vaccine issue in the first place. The UK had completely abloished many of the childhood diseases such as rubella, DPT and polio, however these diseases are making a return not by 'natural cause' but rather human stupidity.
So a possible solution would be to have children certified as vaccinated which will allow for entry to schools and other public facilities as this will provide safety for those vaccinated also it will force adults to take their kids for vaccines. The downside will be denying the child an education if the parents are EXTREMELY stubborn. Children are dependent on their parents in making the correct decisions to protect them and are unable to make a decision themselves thus if the parents are too stupid to realise that the vaccine is important for their child's safety and are scared of hyped up adverse effects the child is left in danger. Sometimes in medicine things must be done against the will of the patient and their guardians (like committing a psychotic patient into an asylum).
So again in conclusion
Do you think its ethical for government to step in on this type of thing ?