DStv copyright takedown on AfriForumTV's launch video

Jan

Who's the Boss?
Staff member
Joined
May 24, 2010
Messages
14,887
Reaction score
13,575
Location
The Rabbit Hole
DStv blocks AfriForumTV launch video on YouTube

DStv had YouTube take down the launch video of a new Afrikaans streaming service based on a suspicious copyright claim.

The target of South Africa's biggest pay-TV broadcaster was AfriForumTV, a new Afrikaans-focused video streaming service launched by civil rights organisation AfriForum on Monday.
 
Afriforum should have called DSTV's bluff and submitted a counter notification if they had the rights to the content.

What happens next?​

Your counter notification will be forwarded to the claimant if it meets all legal requirements and clearly explains your right to use the content. Under most circumstances, we won't forward the counter notification to any party other than the original claimant. If the counter notification is forwarded, it will include the full text, including any personal info you’ve entered.

The claimant has 10 business days, as required by copyright law, to reply to your counter notification. They’ll need to respond with evidence that they’ve taken legal action to keep the content from being restored to YouTube.


https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2807684?hl=en

That would have forced DSTV to take Afriforum to court for copyright infringement, elsewise retract the claim. They can usually win attorney's fees if the defendant can prove that the claimant was doing it maliciously.
 
Yeah, except AfriForum was forced to cut a trailer they allegedly had the rights to.
Hopefully they get it sorted. But they are not the only ones struggling with this. I have watched so many channels where the Content Creators are super frustrated with YouTube removing stuff, even stuff they own. YouTube doesn't have the capacity to monitor and check every request they receive and can take weeks to months to sort something out. So they end up just having to cut it out until YouTube gets their kitchen in order.
 
...cue incoming coffee and muffin session articles about how unfair YouTube is and taking business away from DStv!

/moving on from Netflix for now
 
Afriforum should have called DSTV's bluff and submitted a counter notification if they had the rights to the content.


That would have forced DSTV to take Afriforum to court for copyright infringement, elsewise retract the claim. They can usually win attorney's fees if the defendant can prove that the claimant was doing it maliciously.
Maybe they know they are guilty?
 

"The Streisand effect is a phenomenon that occurs when an attempt to hide, remove, or censor information has the unintended consequence of increasing awareness of that information, often via the Internet. It is named after American singer Barbra Streisand, whose attempt to suppress the California Coastal Records Project’s photograph of her residence in Malibu, California, taken to document California coastal erosion, inadvertently drew greater attention to the photograph in 2003"

Well done DSTV, great job
 
They should have challenged the claim, IIRC, the strike remains which means you have complied basically admitting to your error. I don't know whether YouTube has changed this.
 
seems to be the answer to Youtube
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X