Hello, he lived in the 17th century, when wars were the order of the day.
Can't exactly pit him against the likes of Hitler, Mugabe, etc unless you just want to troll
Ah, so because that was the milieu it was acceptable. Well, I could argue that it was the milieu in South Africa for white people to be racist, and question why the names like D.F. Malan, BJ Voster et al. were scrapped. It's the same argument as yours, though perhaps a bit more localised.
Speaking of which, Jan Smuts was one of the greatest South Africans that lived, and he was constantly trying to extend the rights of blacks. Of course, he couldn't argue too strongly as he was operating in a parliamentary framework and any policies that were too liberal for the (white, voting) people of the time would be soundly rejected. AFAIR he lost the elections in 1948 over apartheid. So why was Jan Smuts airport renamed?
Secondly, dicatator like characters have existed throughout history and don't actually really fit into one era or another. One can go back into biblical times and find cases of this, through the Roman times, through the dark ages, through the renaissance, right into the 20th century. Stalin and Hitler were recent, so was Pol Pot and Mao Zedong (Tse Tsung). Mugabe is still in power. Darfur is 21st century. Perhaps you could argue that the 20th Century was one of the worst for dictators. Kind of scraps your milieu argument, doesn't it?
Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, I am not speaking about Shaka the warrior, I'm speaking about Shaka the dictator and committer of genocide.
Word came to Shaka Zulu that his mother was sick and in 1827 Nandi died, about 7,000 people were executed and the whole clan of the Zulu was ordered to 3 months starvation in grief of Nandi. history claims that this is what pulled the Zulu clan to the ground because Shaka as a King lost control over the nation and warriors and enemies were rising against him.
http://www.zulu-culture-history.com/shaka_zulu_life.htm
As a counter argument, I will offer that he was the greatest military commander in Africa - and was truly a great warrior.
Naming the airport King Shaka helps entrench it in the KwaZulu-Natal region as he is an internationally known historical figure... I can't think of a better name to call the airport given its location, and how it will help boost tourism.
Again, Stalin is probably the best known Russian of all times, doesn't mean you want to name an airport after him.
One might argue that Cetshwayo is a better choice. After all, he was King during the Battle of Isandlwana - probably the greatest military victory of the Zulu's ever, considering the much superior fire power they were up against. Cetshwayo was also much more peace loving.
Love how people just consider you ignorant because they don't agree with you.
Yep and yep.
You hardly showed much insight in your previous quote, perhaps some reasoning as to why he was "one of the greatest kings" might give your argument more credibility.