ToxicBunny
Oi! Leave me out of this...
I think we can find that information out...might take a bit of digging though.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
His research focuses on slavery and post-emancipation labour in the Western Cape, the social history of 18th century Cape Town, and heritage studies in South Africa and Southeast Asia.
He is head of a major research project on Social Identities in VOC (Dutch East India Company)....
- on editorial board, International Journal of Heritage Studies
Undergraduate teaching:
Indian, Southeast Asian and Australian history
Social history of Dutch art
Historiography and historical research methods
Heritage studies
Postgraduate teaching:
Social history of the VOC Cape and Asia
Indian Ocean history
Professor Nigel Worden
MA PhD Cantab
Room 237
E-mail: [email protected]
Telephone: 021 650 2951
Research interests:
Indian Ocean slave trade in the 17th and 18th centuries; slavery and post-emancipation labour in the western Cape; 18th century Cape Town; public history
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?click_id=105&art_id=qw1076909760716S162&set_id=1Ten years into democracy, South African teachers are still battling the legacy of apartheid, whose history primers painted black people as "primitive" and even "barbaric
Dear Professor Worden,
My name is Debbie [wits polisci]... I am also a member of the South African MyBroadband online forum.
Yesterday one of the members of the forum, a matric student, mentioned that he had found their English prelim paper to be geared in a particular taste:
K, just wrote my english prelim and I gotta say you gotta love our nice non racist government!
Every passage,comprehension,summary was about how great black people are and they are the driving force behind our economic growth and how we must not be new south africans but rather remember our race and South African history & that Apartheid is the reason everyone is so racist today...
Isn't this like propaganda or something???
(EDIT) For the record, im not racist and have tons of black friends and have no problem with any of them
In the context of the above post, another highschool student responded by posting his school textbook's definition of 'racism'-
http://img411.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc01170fq7.jpg (photo of the textbook)
http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/5208/dsc01171bz8.jpg (photo of the page)
This second student mentions that you are one of the authors of his textbook. After googling you appear to be the most qualifed of the authors, thus I thought I would contact you with regard to the definition of 'racism' in your book.
As in the photograph, it appears that the defnition given is as follows-
Racism The belief that Europeans were superior to Africans and Asians.
I can understand that, in the context of the page or topic under discussion the type of racism being referred to might pertain exclusively to the general type of racism perpetuated in Sourthern Africa by people of European descent. However, to state this limited view of racism as a definition of the word is, as the first matric student mentioned, bordering on 'propaganda'.
Identity issues are something that fascinate me too. In particular I see the current importance of forging something resembling a common South African identity. To me, this is central to a maturing of our national politics. To this end, it is important to present history to school learners as accurately as possible. Despite media presentations and, er, even the defnition in school textbooks, racism is not only, to put it colloquially, a "white on black" thing (not to mention the problems inherent in referring to blacks as 'Africans' and whites as 'Europeans'!). It would be nice if learners viewed their textbooks with a critical eye, but reality is that they don't. We cannot- should not- teach kids that racism is a 'one-way street'.
We would like to humbly request you to request your publishers to change this defnition in future printings of the textbook? [Perhaps a more acceptable and universal definition would be-
Racism The belief that one race of people are superior, or inferior, to another race.
I understand it's difficult to define this term because it is, at heart, a fluid social construction; and whilst the definition I give might not be perfect, is it not at the end of the day a more encompassing definition.....?]
Sincerely,
Ok, I only got faxed these 3 pages, but as I understand it this is the part of the paper that dealt with race and that everyone is most upset about:
http://img118.imageshack.us/img118/435/01ay8.jpg
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/3264/02mo1.jpg
http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/5762/03ht8.jpg
I have this in pdf too if anyone can suggest somewhere to upload it.
This is not on.
Who set this paper? Was it set by the school, or a wider exam board?
Edit: This paper is very much not on.
Dastrix on the cover of the paper should be the name of the examning board, the people it was set by, etc etc- can you ask the person who faxed this to you if they have this info? I am curious to see.
This is not on.
Who set this paper? Was it set by the school, or a wider exam board?
Edit: This paper is very much not on.
I would have walked out. (I once walked out of a history paper in std 9- yes I was a sh1tstirrer)
Lol they just quoted an article and asked enlish related questions.
"Adapted from the Weekend Review"
IMO if its from a public newspaper there nothing wrong with the paper. Its current affairs let it be lol, there worst crap on this forum lol!
True. That counts for the good ol' wiki as well.JK8, I come from a place that says 'just because it's in print doesn't mean it's true!'
You display exactly the lack of critical thinking I mentioned in my email.