Eskom load-shedding catastrophe

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daily Investor
  • Start date Start date
Why is it false?
Because Eskom has been on an upward trend since De Ruyter left, There has been little but noticeable positives however I have never seen an article stating these facts, It is always the negative being peddled around as if Eskom cannot survive without De Ruyter.
 
Because Eskom has been on an upward trend since De Ruyter left, There has been little but noticeable positives however I have never seen an article stating these facts, It is always the negative being peddled around as if Eskom cannot survive without De Ruyter.
Yes, and doom and gloom as if Eskom is about to fall over at any moment now.
Reality: it will always be loadshedding, just like the rest of Africa.
 
Because Eskom has been on an upward trend since De Ruyter left, There has been little but noticeable positives however I have never seen an article stating these facts, It is always the negative being peddled around as if Eskom cannot survive without De Ruyter.

Oh. Okay then.
 
Because Eskom has been on an upward trend since De Ruyter left, There has been little but noticeable positives however I have never seen an article stating these facts, It is always the negative being peddled around as if Eskom cannot survive without De Ruyter.
My understanding was that EAF has been lower this year for every single period relative to last year under de Ruyter. The only exception being that 1 world cup week where Eskom irrationally put its foot flat and burnt all the diesel.
 
Because Eskom has been on an upward trend since De Ruyter left, There has been little but noticeable positives however I have never seen an article stating these facts, It is always the negative being peddled around as if Eskom cannot survive without De Ruyter.
Reading this post in the middle of a 2 hour outage, to be followed, barely 2 hours later, by another 2 hour outage.

Excuse me if I cough "Bullsh¡te!!!"
 
My understanding was that EAF has been lower this year for every single period relative to last year under de Ruyter. The only exception being that 1 world cup week where Eskom irrationally put its foot flat and burnt all the diesel.
Nobody needs you coming here with facts to counter Epahs very valid anti-white rant...
 
Reading this post in the middle of a 2 hour outage, to be followed, barely 2 hours later, by another 2 hour outage.

Excuse me if I cough "Bullsh¡te!!!"
Stolen cables in your area doesn't equate to load-shedding sadly. Just because you have an outage doesn't mean it is eskom.
 
Nobody needs you coming here with facts to counter Epahs very valid anti-white rant...
I am not Anti-white, I am anti De ruyter. These articles like putting him on a pedestal just simply based on his race and that is what my fight here is about. That is why i said they like pushing this narrative.
 
Because Eskom has been on an upward trend since De Ruyter left, There has been little but noticeable positives however I have never seen an article stating these facts, It is always the negative being peddled around as if Eskom cannot survive without De Ruyter.
I would hate for it to be true, but this won't last.
 
I am not Anti-white, I am anti De ruyter. These articles like putting him on a pedestal just simply based on his race and that is what my fight here is about. That is why i said they like pushing this narrative.
Well I got my solar (as many others) while he was still CEO and no indication that he will resign.
We all know that this will not be fixed any time soon regardless of colour of the CEO or board for that matter.
There is still lots of money to me milked from Eskom so no rush in really fixing it.
 
Stolen cables in your area doesn't equate to load-shedding sadly. Just because you have an outage doesn't mean it is eskom.
How many idiots call faults loadshedding. Jirre no man :ROFL:
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X