greg0205
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2010
- Messages
- 29,734
- Reaction score
- 31,554
There is always a winner in war, but it comes at a price.
Mmkay... Can you point out one since 1945? Plenty to choose from, but just one will do.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
There is always a winner in war, but it comes at a price.
The ANC?Mmkay... Can you point out one since 1945? Plenty to choose from, but just one will do.
You won't be alive to enjoy any of the fruits borne (if any) by a civil war.There is always a winner in war, but it comes at a price.
The ANC?
You won't be alive to enjoy any of the fruits borne (if any) by a civil war.
True, but it is not about me. It is about my children, their children, the future.
There is always a winner in war, but it comes at a price.
And, here is another post, not by me, that will explain to you why this war is imminent.
Their future is best served by democratic, electoral change. You teaching them about voting yet?
What's the point? They also won't survive a civil war.Their future is best served by democratic, electoral change. You teaching them about voting yet?
He will need to make lots of children before their vote will ever hope to make a change.Their future is best served by democratic, electoral change. You teaching them about voting yet?
He clearly doesn't believe in democracy.
What's the point? They also won't survive a civil war.
I do, but democracy does not exist, nor work nor will it ever in South Africa.
I know about war, violence, unrest and have seen what it does. This country needs a war.
A civil war will not last that long in South Africa. It will come to an end and quickly too.
A civil war will not last that long in South Africa. It will come to an end and quickly too.
WTF is wrong with you?
said Paul Kruger and Alfred MilnerA civil war will not last that long in South Africa. It will come to an end and quickly too.
There are NO winners in war.
Fully agree - only winners are those not participating on the ground.except for manufactures of of armaments if outside of the theater of war
Great Britain arguably "won" the American civil war but to do a full economic analysis - factoring in the effects of having such an economy and so on.
A war in SA will be in my view to the benefit of China and Angola actually so maybe Visser is on the pay of the more sinister arms of the Chinese government
said Paul Kruger and Alfred Milner
and actually despite knowing I will get a warning and possible section banning let me put this out there:
stop being a ****ing moron, you are advancing the notion that the horror of war befalling millions of people is a good thing
Perhaps this is what we need.
We need a civil war, which will be sparked by the collapse of Eskom, people killing another, killing government officials - especially ministers and presidents, causing the collapse of the government here in SA.
The group that walks out of this the strongest will eventually be able to rebuild the country, but we first need to get there - hopefully this will happen.
unfortunately there remains people in this country who still believe in kragdadigheid and have visions of themselves as this ultimate polisieman, while not advocating violence against them we do need to as a society make measures to contain their bull**** - which starts by calling it out.Fully agree - only winners are those not participating on the ground.
I'm reading some of these comments in utter disbelief. Who in their right ****ing mind wants a civil war?
(excluding non-participants)